Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DesertRhino
Well there is one slight difference, though I get your point. Jerry Miculek uses nothing beyond himself to rapid fire weapons. The bump stock enables anyway to shoot more rapidly. For example, using a device such as a bump stock would not be allowed by anyone in shooting competition.

Notice though he has not banned bump stocks 1 year after the Las Vegas shooting. So he is not just acting unilaterally to ban them. What is he doing exactly to ban them?

Here is President Trump at a news briefing back in Oct. 2018. He thought it would be 2 or 3 weeks back then to finally enact the ban. Perhaps he is finding that banning them is not really possible? At least he is going through procedures, and not creating his own laws. Also, the NRA said they would not fight a ban.

So everyone needs to wait until it happens, and how it happens, if it happens. As it stands right now, bump stocks are still allowed to be bought & sold.

29 posted on 12/08/2018 9:13:54 AM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Robert DeLong

You are incorrect. He is NOT going through procedures. Full auto weapons are precisely defined in law, and ATF correctly defermined that bumpfire stocks did mot comvert a firearm to full auto . By declaring bumpfire stocks to be machine guns ATF would be effectively assuming the role of congress in writing legislation. If this is allowed to stand the potential damage would be enormous, and not limited to firearms and the 2nd amendment.


32 posted on 12/08/2018 9:35:21 AM PST by allblues (God is neither a Republican nor a Democrat but Satan is definitely a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson