Replies

My original statement was a statement of fact not a complaint. My retirement is untouched by the change and likely will not be effected, but it may not be for future retirees. But rather than disagree with what was said, you chose to come back as an a-hole, attacking and throwing up non-relevant arguments. Not one of your arguments had a thing to do with what was said. You come back as an a-hole, that is the way you get treated in response. You apparently don’t have the mental ability to understand what was being said. If you are going to throw up arguments, at least make them accurate and relevant. Retirees vs those who honorable served amount to 17-20 percent, not the 2 percent you stated. And, the fact that retirees still have plenty of benefits is an asinine statement and would be like you contracting for a 2000 sq ft house to be build and when the house is done the contractor tells you that you are only getting a 1000 sq ft house, but that it is still plenty of house. Your statement that my reply says that those who lost legs arms etc didn’t earn anything is also false and again shows your lack of mental ability to understand what was said. I dealt with a lot of pricks like you in the military who have chips on their shoulder, feel entitled, have a myopic view of what is going on and lack the mental ability to see beyond their immediate little world. Don’t bother responding. You’ve proven you are a complete a-hole who is incapable of looking beyond his little entitled world. I’ve wasted enough time on you.