Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: artichokegrower; All
Not against the law if you have a letter from the department saying it is necessary for you to carry on the airline.

As he was head of the department, he could have issued a letter for himself.

Totally legal.

If a subordinate tried to get his boss in trouble for a legal activity, as well as put him in danger by revealing he usually carried, the subordinate may well have been legally fired.

16 posted on 12/09/2018 1:26:55 PM PST by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain
Not against the law if you have a letter from the department saying it is necessary for you to carry on the airline.

As he was head of the department, he could have issued a letter for himself.

Totally legal.

If a subordinate tried to get his boss in trouble for a legal activity, as well as put him in danger by revealing he usually carried, the subordinate may well have been legally fired.


Is it totally legal? What was the basis for the necessity for him to carry? That it's more convenient for him that way? I doubt they can just hand these letters out willy-nilly, I'm sure they have to have an actual reason for it.
29 posted on 12/09/2018 3:55:18 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson