Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer

Ping.


31 posted on 12/09/2018 2:16:18 PM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: zeestephen

If you actually read the paper they explain what the study actually supports fairly clearly. Mitochondrial DNA is not subject to natural selection in the same way as phenotypical DNA (code for actual adaptive changes). What they measured was the way this DNA “drifts” or acquires noisy differences across populations over time. They found that 90% of all species today have roughly the same amount of drift in their mitochondrial DNA. This is consistent with the sudden reduction of a population to very small numbers due to some environmental catastrophe or pandemic. This effectively “resets the drift clock” since the populations restart from about the same baseline as the surviving ancestors. If 90% of species populations were reduced about 100,000 to 200,000 years ago they would all show about the same degree of drift when measured now. This doesn’t mean the dinosaurs didn’t live 65 million years ago and that our phenotypic DNA doesn’t clearly show the validity of natural selection.


40 posted on 12/09/2018 2:29:50 PM PST by Dave Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson