More dismissive namecalling tactics from a secular humanist.
If as you now say since it does no longer take billions of years but thousands where are all those millions of transitional species. Give us one example of a fossil found that was a transitional animal.
I expect more name calling since there is no fossil, only bullying tactics all you Darwinists use. How dare anyone question science!
"bray" is your name and when you make false accusations you "bray" like a jack***.
Don't like being called out for it?
Then stick to the truth, pal.
bray: "If as you now say since it does no longer take billions of years but thousands where are all those millions of transitional species."
Obviously you mistake me for somebody else, since I've posted no such thing and now two posts in a row you've made false accusations against me.
What's up with that bray?
bray: "Give us one example of a fossil found that was a transitional animal."
I don't know why you suppose that's such a clever argument when just a little reflection shows every individual, without exception, is "transitional" between its ancestors and it's descendants, if any.
Studies show that every individual is conceived with a small number of mostly harmless mutations which get passed along to their descendants.
Such mutations accumulate from generation to generation, sometimes acted on by natural selection, over many generations become the source for discernments between breeds, sub-species, species, genera, etc.
In the past 150+ years collectors have found, identified & stored billions of individual fossils representing hundreds of thousands of species.
Every one, without exception, is "transitional".
Here's a summary of some of the better known.