Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court sides with Planned Parenthood in funding fight [Roberts, Kavanuagh join libs]
CNN ^ | 12/10/2018 | Ariane De Vogue

Posted on 12/10/2018 7:35:37 AM PST by GIdget2004

The Supreme Court Monday rebuffed efforts by states to block funding to Planned Parenthood.

It left in place two lower court opinions that said that states violate federal law when they terminate Medicaid contracts with Planned Parenthood affiliates who offer preventive care for low income women.

It would have taken four justices to agree to hear the issue, and only three conservative justices -- Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch -- voted to hear the case.

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh appeared to side with the court's liberals in not taking up the case -- showing an effort to avoid high-profile abortion-related issues for now.

Roberts and Kavanaugh "likely have serious objections," said Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at the University of Texas School of Law. "But such votes seem to be a signal that they would rather avoid contentious, high-profile disputes for now, at least where possible."

The case concerned whether states can block Medicaid funds from Planned Parenthood affiliates that provide such women with annual health screens, contraceptive coverage and cancer screening.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; babykillers; brettkavanaugh; fakeheadline; fakenews; kavanaugh; maga; medicaid; plannedparenthood; ppjusticekavanaugh; ppjusticeroberts; ppjusticethomas; ppscotus; prolife; refusedtoconsider; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-225 next last
To: albie

But does it surprise you?


41 posted on 12/10/2018 8:02:20 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

It’s pretty sick when the so called Supreme Court believes that U.S. taxpayers should be forced to fund baby killers.


42 posted on 12/10/2018 8:03:02 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (#NotARussianBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IamConservative
That says more about the nature of the cases the court heard than the political views of the judges. There are a lot of unanimous and lopsided cases that nobody ever hears about because they're inconsequential to most Americans.

There was an interesting report a few months ago that summarized the U.S. Supreme Court decisions in the 2017-18 term. Apparently the two justices who voted on the same side more than any other pair of justices were Clarence Thomas and Ruth Bader Ginsberg. Go figure. LOL.

43 posted on 12/10/2018 8:04:24 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: generally

There is no opposition that needs to be overcome, with respect to such decisions here. Who would overturn the Supreme Court if Kavanaugh went the other way?


44 posted on 12/10/2018 8:04:37 AM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: albie

Cowards


45 posted on 12/10/2018 8:04:41 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

No surprise to me whatsoever


46 posted on 12/10/2018 8:04:49 AM PST by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: generally

“Maybe conservatives are finally learning how, also.”

My guess is not.


47 posted on 12/10/2018 8:04:50 AM PST by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

My thought as well - it was likely not a broad enough case for them to consider it of enough importance to have a full hearing at that level.

Likely wait for additional district rulings or a broader case before decided to consider it.

Story makes it out to be as important as a ruling - when it was really that they just didn’t decide to hear the case. Happens much more than not. Few actually get heard compared to the number submitted, as I understand it.


48 posted on 12/10/2018 8:06:03 AM PST by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

I don’t know enough to know what to make of this case and the arguments on both sides. But that sentence seems pretty clear to me—I think the states wanted to block PP as a provider of any Medicaid-funded services, apparently based on the expose of their trafficking in tissue sales.

If I understand this not-too-clear article and Justice Thomas correctly, the issue as he sees it at least is whether individual Medicaid recipients have standing to challenge such a prohibition.


49 posted on 12/10/2018 8:07:39 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
Kavanaugh trying to rebuild his reputation with women! We'll be seeing more such actions for a few years at least!
50 posted on 12/10/2018 8:07:53 AM PST by ExSES (the "bottom-line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

It would really suck if, after all the political capital expended trying to confirm Kavanaugh, if he turned out to be a lib. Maybe he is trying to avoid being impeached?


51 posted on 12/10/2018 8:07:59 AM PST by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Fake news


52 posted on 12/10/2018 8:08:27 AM PST by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
states violate federal law when they terminate Medicaid contracts with Planned Parenthood affiliates who offer preventive care for low income women

They do NOT offer "preventive" care to women. They do not have the facilities to perform mamograms or other services. They perform abortions, that is what they do. That is their profit motive.

53 posted on 12/10/2018 8:08:30 AM PST by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

I expected this from Roberts. Not Kavanaugh.


54 posted on 12/10/2018 8:09:04 AM PST by mrsixpack36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

And how would not siding with Roberts jeopardize Kavanaugh’s job? There is no chance of his being “impeached” even now.

Roberts to me is a liberal. His behavior is based on ideology, not fear of any retribution.


55 posted on 12/10/2018 8:09:19 AM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

“Possibly” compromised?


56 posted on 12/10/2018 8:09:19 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

I’m not sure I’m with you here. If I understand correctly, Kavanaugh’s position here represents a limit on the power of individual states.


57 posted on 12/10/2018 8:10:42 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Hmm.

There needs to be a good study on this issue; what avenues can be used to stop the destruction of human life?

There must be a legal way to do this that these two justices would green light.


58 posted on 12/10/2018 8:12:15 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: albie

Not surprised at all. Roberts is not going to over turn RvW bet the farm. Unless RBG goes the inanticide will continue.


59 posted on 12/10/2018 8:14:53 AM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

The only ‘preventative care’ PP provides is preventing children from being born


60 posted on 12/10/2018 8:15:54 AM PST by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-225 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson