Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/14/2018 7:34:29 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

Some people will never be satisfied, that we have abolished slavery, and worked so hard to eliminate discrimination.


2 posted on 12/14/2018 7:47:20 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Liberals are ashamed because the Founders didn't get everything exactly right the first time around?

In actuality, what they came up with was a sea change, and the best that could have been accomplished given the times and the circumstances.

3 posted on 12/14/2018 8:20:34 AM PST by sima_yi ( Reporting live from the far North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
The writer is confused. The American Revolution was about Liberty & self Government. It was the Leftist Jacobin Revolution in France that sought to couple equality with liberty, which is an oxymoron, easily debunked.

Declaration Of Independence--With Study Guide.

It would also be instructive to consider the Northwest Ordinance, as an indicator of the mindset of the Founders on Egalitarianism.

4 posted on 12/14/2018 8:29:21 AM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
I guess people don't understand that one of the grievances listed in the Declaration of independence was that the British were inciting slave revolts.

No, the founders didn't give a crap about freeing slaves or "civil rights". They were concerned with getting independence from England, and that is all they were concerned with.

5 posted on 12/14/2018 9:10:32 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin; Ohioan

Another Townhall joker hastens the decline of conservative scholarship because he really wants it to be Lyndon Johnson liberalism.

Unlike this Scott Rasmussen, Russell Kirk wrote knowledgeably about the American Revolution.

Kirk called it a “conservative revolution” because the American colonials were seeking to defend their historic rights as Englishmen at a time when King George’s government wasn’t respecting them.

They weren’t social progressives looking to create an improved society. They were defending what they had.

They had been demanding representation in Parliament, and if they couldn’t get that from London they would announce their independence and fight a war of rebellion to get it.


8 posted on 12/15/2018 12:34:28 PM PST by Pelham (Secure Voter ID. Mexico has it, because unlike us they take voting seriously)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson