Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rintintin

Re: Leasing is better for businesses than individuals unless the individual wants a new vehicle every 3 years, yada, yada, yada

Says who?

Dumb statement. Owning assets that decline in value sucks regardless of it’s a business (or personal). This is the key reason for leasing. Let the leasing company eat the loss.

Leasing isn’t just for cars. Until taxes are cut way more than current levels (or losses become more deductible), leasing will make a lot of sense if you anticipate that your equipment or autos/trucks will fall in value.

I did not invent this. It’s business 101


16 posted on 12/14/2018 12:26:45 PM PST by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: conservative98

If you think that leasing companies operate at a loss, then I’ve got a bridge in Death Valley to sell you, LOL.


18 posted on 12/14/2018 12:34:17 PM PST by Sparticus (Primary the Tuesday group!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98
I have driven a total of 570,000 miles in my last two new vehicles -- about a 30%-70% split of personal-business driving. Leasing either one of them would have been idiotic.

Anyone who talks about a vehicle as a "depreciating asset" should first consider that a vehicle is providing value as it is being used. There is always an intangible value of the convenience, the flexibility, and the mobility a vehicle provides in any situation.

Another thing to consider is that owning a vehicle for a long time works really well if you get a LOT of business use out of it. The beauty of the tax code is that the IRS establishes a fixed rate for tax deductibility for all passenger vehicles and light trucks. It's currently 54.5 cents per mile. Imagine owning a vehicle that is fully paid off and costs only fuel, insurance, and repairs to operate. Drive that vehicle 15,000 per year for business use, and you've got a mileage deduction in excess of $8,000 to report on your tax return. Even with $3.00/gallon gasoline and a low fuel efficiency of 15 mpg you're looking at no more than $3,000 in fuel expenses for the year. Add another $1,000 for insurance and you're up to $4,000. That leaves more than $4,000 from your $8,000+ deduction to cover the expenses of operating the vehicle. It would have to be a junkyard candidate in order to have more than $4,000 in annual maintenance expenses!

24 posted on 12/14/2018 12:52:16 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

“Owning assets that decline in value sucks regardless of it’s a business (or personal). This is the key reason for leasing. Let the leasing company eat the loss.”

The expected depreciation is built into the lease terms. If the car depreciates less than expected (compared to the “residual value”) over the duration of the lease, and your lease agreement gives you the option to buy the car at lease end for that residual value, then in principle you can come out ahead by simply buying the car. In any case, the leasee always implicitly pays for the (expected) depreciation.


29 posted on 12/14/2018 2:31:21 PM PST by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson