Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

This is worthy of repeating and should be in the headlines.

“Now, as this FR lawyers states, the second 302 was NOT a write-up of the original Jan. 24 interview per a 302 format, but a recollection by Strzok in Aug, 2017 that was made to seem like a second 302.”


25 posted on 12/14/2018 9:45:34 PM PST by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: tired&retired; Paladin2; MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

Where is the original 302 of the Jan. 24, 2017 interview with Gen. Flynn?????

Is Mueller trying to get away with not even submitting that to Judge Sullivan???

Without close analysis of THAT 302 the case never should have been allowed to proceed at all.

Bad enough that they did this b.s. at all, but if they are not relying upon the original 302 and if Judge Sullivan is not given access to that original 302, the guilty plea and the whole case should be thrown out yesterday.... or last year.

I sure hope Judge Sullivan is seeing through all this b.s.


28 posted on 12/14/2018 10:05:28 PM PST by Trump_the_Evil_Left (FReeper formerly known as Enchante (registered Sept. 5, 2001), back from the wild....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson