[Rurudyne]

When “liberalism” is now socialism / communism with a dose of elites who know better then everyone else calling the shots it’s a good bet that anything they’d call illiberalism may not be as advertised.

[goldstategop]

If you’re opposed to the EUSSR, you’re illiberal. Got it.

[robowombat]

What we have emerging is a form of oligarchic plutocratic capitalism in which the finance capital segment seeks to dominate the other sectors. Authoritarian, top down direction is required to have a controlled global order for the financiers to exert a significant level of control over other market sectors and national economies. There are definite elements of socialism and fake leftist populism in the structure the bankers are pushing along with a determined effort to denaturalize western cultures (East Asian and Muslim cultures are much harder to penetrate.) Muslims can be controlled by large scale bribery and a degree of allowing their violent resentment towards western culture to be satisfied. East Asian regimes are deeply impregnated with a series of cultural norms that are very effective but alien to the thinking of the banksters. These countries represent a true challenge to bankster control. But Islam and East Asia are relatively unaffected by the Enlightenment. The reasons are different but in both cases it makes them much less subject fake enlightenment programs such as the’Worldwide Human Rights Regime’. Much of the west is pliable because of loss of morale and general lack of strong cultural values. This leaves them with a screen of words that are Enlightenment cliches (freedom of religious expression is a good example). The bankster cultural whores have reversed the dynamic to make it ‘Freedom from religious expression’ . People who believe in nothing can be convinced of anything. The bankster are busy doing just that so no national unit will have the cultural robustness to resist whatever they desire.