[Magnum44]

I’m confused. If they weren’t going to present the evidence to the committee, then why did they come forward to testify at all?

[laplata]

I’m confused. If they weren’t going to present the evidence to the committee, then why did they come forward to testify at all?

><><><

That’s my question, too. They were probably threatened.

[Vlad The Inhaler]

If they weren’t going to present the evidence to the committee, then why did they come forward to testify at all?

Just a thought...

Maybe so it won't disappear down the Memory Hole like everything else congress, the FBI and DOJ have touched in the last two years.

The witnesses also told the committee today they had to send their evidence to the Huber investigation THREE TIMES because they kept losing it.

[Widget Jr]

As others have posted, Doyle Moynihan make their living this way. There is another issue. If Meadows actually wanted to act, he would have before the lame duck session. Even if he gets the information, the next session of congress will makes sure it gets lost again.

[Stentor]

I’m confused. If they weren’t going to present the evidence to the committee, then why did they come forward to testify at all?

The witnesses explained to the committee that the committee invited them and that they would be perfectly happy to be uninvited. They are financial investigators and do not want to jeopardize their potential rewards for dimming to the IRS on the Clinton RICO operation. OK

[morphing libertarian]

Hillary’s instructions