Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GIdget2004

Bump stocks are not a hill to die on.


36 posted on 12/18/2018 8:42:15 AM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: glorgau

“Bump stocks are not a hill to die on.”

But that hill has slippery slopes on all sides.


75 posted on 12/18/2018 9:21:01 AM PST by DOC44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: glorgau
Bump stocks are not a hill to die on.

Precisely, my good FRiend.

I never even heard of them until the Las Vegas tragedy.

I don't think that the majority of us gun owners want to make a 2A stand that hinges on something that the general public associates with mayhem, and that serve little or no purpose for us.

(I have taken the precaution of donning my asbestos undies, as some here might politely disagree.)

89 posted on 12/18/2018 9:40:00 AM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in-never, never,never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: glorgau; Trump.Deplorable; DarthVader; StoneWall Brigade; NFHale

Who says we’d have died on the hill? I doubt a single vote was changed from D to R because Trump caved on this.

Admittedly this is a minor thing, almost no one has bump stocks and the ban on them is unenforceable anyway. But why cave? Let the libs cry about bump stocks.


193 posted on 12/18/2018 4:21:46 PM PST by Impy (I have no virtue to signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson