Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: otness_e

Chuckle Chuckle. Sounds like that argument is a “save face” type of argument after the disastrous Iraq war. None of those things would have happened. Face it, deep down people know they were fooled and a lot of them can’t come to grips with the horror they sanctioned


97 posted on 07/28/2020 7:28:55 PM PDT by Sir_Humphrey (Strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, weak minds discuss people -Socrates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: Sir_Humphrey

Actually, it’s not saving face at all. And for the record, the 9/11 Commission Report already made it VERY clear that al Qaeda already had training camps in Iraq, with Saddam Hussein’s likely support. And aside from that, when even Conservapedia, whom most of the editors there are NOT Bush fans by any stretch (and most certainly aren’t fond of Neocons), fully acknowledge that there were in fact WMDs in Iraq, I think that’s enough to say there were in fact WMDs in Iraq. Not to mention the fact that General Sada and General Al-Tikriti both verified there were in fact WMDs (and why would they risk their lives exposing this information if they were lying?).


98 posted on 07/29/2020 5:33:15 AM PDT by otness_e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson