Posted on 12/19/2018 6:14:59 PM PST by Java4Jay
He should be named Satanist of the Year. He is worthy of that.
Based on the criteria that the “Once Great” Financial Times uses for George Soros today, Hitler should have been the man of the year in 1939.
I lived in the UK for a few years in the seventies. At that time the Financial Times was a great magazine totally devoid of political bias. Most sadly they are now political activists.
In the seventies they did cover politics also but totally devoid of bias. They would present both sides of the argument and the reader decided. Relative to economics their coverage was extremely accurate.
Even more insidious today is their coverage of economics with political bias toward socialism and a “ONE EUROPE” which they want to be a “ONE WORLD.”
The Financial Times as a legitimate source of information is dead.
#6. Perhaps they can make this award retroactive to WW2, Hungary.
FT honors KAPO. Churchill is crapping in his grave.
Well, it was either Soros or the Tidy Bowl man. Who GAS about what the leftwing, Financial Times thinks.
Hungary knows that Soros blows.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.