“As Russia’s online election machinations came to light last year”
Oh, I must have missed that. Was that actually backed up with some actual proof?
Before the election, I saw a report that while there was bot activity on both sides, 60% of it was to promote the Democrats.
The left seems to believe that conservatives are incapable of thinking for themselves—that conservatives are just like leftist useful idiots. Thus, to would-be leftist dictators, these stories about Russian bots are supposed to portray conservative voters as mindless automatons who were deflected from voting the way they were supposed to by Russian bots. What apparently does not occur to them is that it is irrelevant to us how many people promote a point of view, because we look at the facts before we make a decision. If, after careful consideration of the facts, I decide that I support the pro-life, pro-small government, pro-freedom candidate, does it really matter what any bot says?
IMPEACH JONES! Muh Russia!!!
In the Trump era, if the Russians didn’t exist, the Failing NYT would have to create an equivalent.
Russians did not influence us.
They only way the Russians could have influenced the 2016 election would be to convince Hillary to run.
Pretty interesting - for those with short memories - the Democrat won by about 22,000 votes The number of write ins.
This is a federal office, so the Federal Election Commission wants to hear about this. At the least, I suspect it is a large and unreported in kind contribution to the Doug Jones campaign.
So they did what they said the Russians were doing on a national scale. First, if they truly believed it was meddling and immoral if not illegal nationally, then surely it would be in Alabama as well. It it truly did move the election results and cost Moore the election, then they are guilty. This would be like robbing a small bank to prove how a big bank was robbed. Still illegal, right? Maybe I’m just not thinking clearly tonight.
“I have no reason to doubt those women”[accusing Roy Moore of sexual assault]-—Jeff ‘the backstabbing rat bastard’ Sessions
>> a group of Democratic tech experts decided to try out similarly deceptive tactics in the fiercely contested Alabama Senate race
was their campaign funding and activity disclosed to the FEC?
>> The project’s operators created a Facebook page on which they posed as conservative Alabamians, using it to try to divide Republicans and even to endorse a write-in candidate to draw votes from Mr. Moore.
time was this would’ve been called “dirty politics” and “a smear campaign”
the kind of troll “f***try” that the Left always denies engaging in. Even when trolls like Moby encourage it in interviews.
Punk the prez? - Moby’s anti-Bush tricks
New York Daily News ^ | 2/09/04 | Rush & Molloy
One of Sen. John Kerry’s celebrity supporters is ready to pull out all the stops to get him elected. Republicans are shrieking over a suggestion by rocker Moby that Democrats spread gossip about President Bush on the Internet. “No one’s talking about how to keep the other side home on Election Day,” Moby tells us. “It’s a lot easier than you think and it doesn’t cost that much. This election can be won by 200,000 votes.”
Moby suggests that it’s possible to seed doubt among Bush’s far-right supporters on the Web.
“You target his natural constituencies,” says the Grammy-nominated techno-wizard. “For example, you can go on all the pro-life chat rooms and say you’re an outraged right-wing voter and that you know that George Bush drove an ex-girlfriend to an abortion clinic and paid for her to get an abortion.
“Then you go to an anti-immigration Web site chat room and ask, ‘What’s all this about George Bush proposing amnesty for illegal aliens?’”
Moby didn’t claim that he believed the abortion story.
Last month, Bush did propose reforms to immigration policy. But he insisted, “I oppose amnesty, placing undocumented workers on the automatic path to citizenship [because it] perpetuates illegal immigration.”
Republican National Committee spokeswoman Christine Iverson likened Moby’s proposal to “dirty campaign tactics we’re already seeing from John Kerry.”
“His campaign was willing to use these kinds of voter suppression tactics against members of his own party in Iowa and New Hampshire,” Iverson says. “John Kerry is a hypocrite. He pledged to run a clean campaign. Then he uses the lowest form of gutter politics to impugn his opponents, Democratic and Republican. It’s unfortunate but this is probably just the beginning of the kind of tactics we’re going to be seeing from John Kerry in the months to come.”
Kerry spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter said, “I doubt that Moby was suggesting anybody suppress the vote. We did not use any dirty tactics against any candidate.
“When it comes to dirty tricks the Republic party wrote the book. We’ve already seen Republican attacks and we haven’t even won the nomination yet. The Republican Party is clearly afraid of John Kerry.”
The ones who influenced the Alabama Senate race in 2017 were the mainstream media. The same group butthurt they couldn’t pull Hillary Clinton over the finish line in 2016 despite their best propaganda efforts.
Sounds like an ‘in kind’ campaign contribution to the Jones campaign
Will their be an investigation?
Violations need to be filed
Where is Mueller? and the CPL?
A click bait scheme to make money is not election interference, whether done by Russians or non-Russians.
The New York Slimes has degenerated into outright Russian hatred, no better than Nazism.
BUMP