Posted on 12/23/2018 3:59:34 PM PST by Eddie01
President Donald Trump and conservatives in Congress earned a historic victory this week by enacting the First Step Act. The landmark bill provides modest yet much-needed prison and sentencing reform modeled on successful reforms already passed in red states.
On Tuesday night, senators passed the First Step Act with support from law enforcement professionals, the faith community, business groups, and the White House, by a vote of 87-12.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., deserves credit for bringing the bill up for a vote.
Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, a former federal prosecutor and leading advocate of the legislation, said, “American families will be stronger and our communities will be safer. This is a huge win for America and President [Trump].”
The president quickly congratulated the Senate on its bipartisan passage of the First Step Act, tweeting that it “will keep our communities safer, and provide hope and a second chance, to those who earn it. In addition to everything else, billions of dollars will be saved. I look forward to signing this into law!”
America is the greatest Country in the world and my job is to fight for ALL citizens, even those who have made mistakes. Congratulations to the Senate on the bi-partisan passing of a historic Criminal Justice Reform Bill….
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 19, 2018
House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said on Tuesday that “criminal justice reform is about giving more Americans a chance at redemption. The House looks forward to sending it to the president to become law.”
In May, the House passed an earlier version of the legislation, co-sponsored by Reps. Doug Collins, R-Ga., and Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., by a vote of 360-59.
On Thursday, the House overwhelmingly approved the Senate’s amended version by a vote of 358-36.
Trump’s signature of the bill marked a historic achievement for his administration.
After steering the bipartisan bill through the Senate, Judiciary Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, said, “the First Step Act takes lessons from history and from states — our laboratories of democracy — to reduce crime, save taxpayer dollars, and strengthen faith and fairness in our criminal justice system.”
History has shown that a “lock ’em up and throw away the key” approach to prisons helped to drive down the high crime rates of the 1980s—and to keep them down. But esteemed criminologists estimate that other phenomena, including improved policing practices, account for 65 percent or more of the crime decline.
Meanwhile, the federal prison population has increased by more than 850 percent since 1980, while federal prison spending has risen from $330 million a year to more than $7 billion a year — more than one-quarter of the Justice Department’s entire budget.
And yet, of the 95 percent of all federal inmates who are eventually released from prison, approximately half are re-arrested within eight years of release.
The handful of senators who opposed the First Step Act implied that the only way to ensure that prisoners do not commit crimes after they are released from prison is to never release them.
That position contrasted sharply with the House’s overwhelming vote for prison reform.
It also ignored a 2011 House Appropriations Committee report that found our re-incarceration rates to be “both financially and socially unsustainable.”
Most importantly, it ignored the superior approaches that conservative leaders across the country have taken to reduce crime, which are reflected in the First Step Act.
In May, Rep. John Rutherford, R-Fla., a former sheriff, said the First Step Act is “about reducing crime.” Too often, he said, prisons release “incorrigible, disruptive inmate[s]” into high-crime communities “and we wonder why these individuals failed and went back to a life of crime.”
Rutherford said the First Step Act “recognizes the importance of following up an arrest with good correctional programming and attempts to change behavior before sending them back to the community,” instead of “setting these individuals up for failure.”
Consider how former New York City Police Commissioner Bill Bratton reduced crime in New York City in the 1990s by 36 percent, including a 45 percent decline in murder, by focusing his officers “on problem solving rather than incidence response,” specifically “changing behavior at the street level and controlling behavior, and thus preventing crime further down the line.”
The First Step Act brings a similar problem-solving strategy to fighting crime by instructing federal prison officials to objectively assess each federal inmate’s risk of recidivating, and to incentivize them to participate in evidence-based programming to change their behavioral issues, whether that is substance abuse, mental health, anger management problems, or something else.
Red states have shown that this approach to incarceration can be a success.
That’s why 34 state attorneys general and many other law enforcement professionals supported the First Step Act.
In Mississippi, Gov. Phil Bryant, a former deputy sheriff, said criminal justice reform measures are one of the main reasons why his state has saved $40 million and seen crime go down 6 percent.
In Texas, expanded substance abuse, mental health, and other treatment programs, among other criminal justice reform measures, have helped the state bring crime rates down to historic lows not seen since the 1960s, save money, and reduce prison populations — all while Texas’ job numbers continue to climb.
In Georgia, too, prisons have successfully shifted focus to “reducing recidivism through effective programming, education, and health care.”
Three years ago, Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal explained that “prisons have always been schools.” “In the past,” he said, “the inmates have learned how to become better criminals. Now, they are taking steps to earn diplomas and gain job skills that will lead to employment after they serve their sentences.”
Today, Georgia’s Department of Corrections “provides effective opportunities for offenders to achieve positive change and to be a more pro-social contributor to society,” thereby “reducing recidivism among the formerly incarcerated population.”
Not only have conservative states led the way on successful prison and sentencing reform, but they have often done so by working with private employers and charitable organizations, especially prison ministries.
As Bryant has said, “prison ministries — all of those things that government doesn’t like to admit to that works — works.”
The First Step Act will now offer federal inmates similar opportunities — partly through private employers, nonprofit treatment providers, and religious organizations—so that they can earn their way to becoming productive, law-abiding members of society.
The president and conservative leaders in Congress have worked hard to bring evidence-based improvements to the federal criminal justice system.
The First Step Act is a major victory for them, for federal inmates and their families, and for our conservative values of limited government, individual freedom, free enterprise, and public safety.
John G. Malcolm is the vice president of the Institute for Constitutional Government and director of the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, overseeing The Heritage Foundation’s work to increase understanding of the Constitution and the rule of law.
John-Michael Seibler is a legal fellow in the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation.
A version of this Op-Ed appeared on The Daily Signal website under the headline “Trump and Congress Earn a Conservative Victory With First Step Act.”
The views expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website.
I’m good with this but we need to address the other side of the coin as well. Having zero penalty (catch and release) for low level offenders in California has resulted in a huge increase in petty theft, burglary, auto breakins, etc. These guys all need to be locked up for a week each time they get caught, otherwise there is no disincentive. Or better yet make them clean bed pans in nursing homes.
This is great for non-violent offenders.
This just in: Israel cedes its territory to the PA in an act of good will and peace in out time - Jared Kushner has been nominated for the Nobel Prize for his persistence in creating Middle East Peace. “He’s a shoo in”, many well informed sources are quoted as saying.
In other news, many violent felons in for drug related crimes have been released back into the community - spike in drug crimes looms over cities predicted ... Ivanka Trump nominated for Nobel Peace Prize for her courageous work on this much needed reform. Pundits are predicting a first husband and wife joint Noble prize award. Film at 11.
Democrats across the country are rejoicing at Trump finally seeing the light and are awaiting the end of all borders so the healthy downtrodden workers of the world can flood in and cure what ails the county with their superior DNA
There will be a meeting of the local chapter of Felons Anonymous at the Democrat Party Center tonight at Round Water Stadium (need large venue to seat all the newly released felons) to discuss vote harvesting techniques ...
Witnesses of violent crime or murder get scared, cops can’t put the bad guys in jail for what they REALLY did.
So they send him away for drugs or a gun, neither of which can be scared away from testimony.
“Yo, cuz, I here just cuz of some POT, dassall..!”
Uh-huh, SURE.
There are a few people who do go away for just that but it’s rare.
Every pot advocate wants you to believe that all the bad guys in jail for drugs were never violent at all.
It’s untrue.
I HATE JARED KUSHNER.
And, uh...so what if his wife is hot.
True.. i am thanking the prz. He is likely to release the man who shot my daughter.. guess he can finish the job. Merry Christmas to victims.
Hope everyone who supports this has to wonder if their daughter will live.
Unless they are serial thieves.
“Unless they are serial thieves.”
—
I agree - harsh, unrelenting punishment for those who steal Captain Crunch!
:D
More mental health “treatment” = more crime, not less.
In May, the House passed an earlier version of the legislation, co-sponsored by Reps. Doug Collins, R-Ga., and Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., by a vote of 360-59.
Thanks Eddie01.
Yes.
Will this result in more petty scumbags being able to vote? If so it’s a major loss.
When liberals overwhelmingly support something with Republicans, we are always hoodwinked and something is rotten. I have learned to be cynical.
Michigan has had a similar program for some time. It’s called the “Michigan Prisoner Re-entry Initiative”, or MPRI. Us officers called it “Most Prisoners Return immediately”, or the “Hug A Thug” program. So you can see how the frontline troops viewed it. It did work partially, but a lot of the success for it was the increased burden thrown onto the local communities housing and supervising these guys and gals on parole.
CC
Why didn’t Trump just pardon or commute the sentences for all these guys two years ago?
“Jared Kushner has been nominated for the Nobel Prize....”
Not so sure about he prestige of the Nobel Prize since Obama won it for doing nothing. IMO
Anyone here anything from the rats? from the African American rats? They had a plan you know still in effect and running in the dark undercurrent of America like most Obama programs, its called social justice where the color of your skin and your background decides whether you are guilty or not regardless of how serious the crime s are. Social justice warriors are indoctrinated in our universities across the country and work closely with other reorganizations in the prison systems and legal aid
This article leaves out the violent criminals who will be let out on the street early to commit more crimes.
There is no reason states can’t offer services after incarceration for federal prisoners. Federal prisons for low-risk prisoners already have boatloads of programs. And this was a waste of the admin’s political capital and engagement with Congress given all else we have to deal with and that we were running down our time of having a GOP House.
I both hear you and am sorry to hear that momincombatboots.
We already have too many prison sentences that are way too short—and here we are shortening them more.
This is the bill that Obama wanted to pass but couldn’t get by a watchful GOP congress. But with the liberal Manhattanite daughter and SIL of our GOP president setting too much of the admin’s agenda, it gets through.
Did someone from the WaaaaaaaPo help your wright these?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.