Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/23/2018 7:17:38 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: digger48

I guess information will be shared on a “need to know” basis. And, apparently, Americans do not Need To Know how corrupt their government is.


2 posted on 12/23/2018 7:21:35 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: digger48

secret courts and now this garbage: sealed subpoenas going all the way to SCOTUS.

What we need is sunlight and a lot of it.


4 posted on 12/23/2018 7:23:07 PM PST by proust (Justice delayed is injustice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: digger48

“...The federal government has until Dec. 31st to respond “
*********************************************
Would this be the “federal government” led by President Trump who the people elected as head of the executive branch or the “federal government” as represented by Mueller who was elected by a single person (I.e., the Deep State ‘RAT Rosenstein)?


5 posted on 12/23/2018 7:24:36 PM PST by House Atreides (My Number)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: digger48
"firstSupreme Court case that would be sealed"

Wew!

8 posted on 12/23/2018 7:27:02 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: digger48

I guess I should really dig into the details, but the first thing that hits me is that the Supreme Court just issued two similar rulings: 1, it ruled in favor of illegal aliens, against the interests of Americans by upholding the stay on the President’s action to keep asylum applicants outside the country; 2, it ruled in favor of a foreign company and against American prosecutors (even if they are Mueller’s team).

Bottom line: who’s side is our Supreme Court on?


9 posted on 12/23/2018 7:27:11 PM PST by JewishRighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: digger48
What’s more, Judge Greg Katsas, President Donald Trump’s first appointee to the D.C. Circuit, recused himself from this case. Katsas was a lawyer in the White House counsel’s office in the early days of the Trump administration, where he handled topics bearing on the Mueller probe. The judge told lawmakers he would recuse himself from cases relating to Mueller’s investigation during his confirmation hearing.

The Mueller appointment was illegal but apparently it's too late to do anything about it.

10 posted on 12/23/2018 7:28:35 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: digger48

Star Chamber secret judicial proceedings were part of English history but dropped due to their serious abuses, etc. now we have secret court proceedings in USA ( fisa, etc, and now this?!) This is very very very serious, imho ,


11 posted on 12/23/2018 7:31:26 PM PST by faithhopecharity (“Politicians arent born, they’re excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: digger48
A mystery grand jury issues a mystery contempt order against a mystery foreign company for violating a mystery subpoena for not turning over mystery information.

Is it just me, or is this some weird Mad Libs game where Mueller gets to fill in the "mystery" at some point later when it suits his case?

-PJ

12 posted on 12/23/2018 7:33:34 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: digger48

Next, there will be a double secret subpoena.


15 posted on 12/23/2018 7:38:06 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: digger48

Thanks for posting. Bookmarking to follow more tomorrow.


17 posted on 12/23/2018 7:42:40 PM PST by MarMema (don't forget to stock up on dogfood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: digger48

WTF


18 posted on 12/23/2018 7:47:46 PM PST by JPJones (More tariffs, less income tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: digger48
My Comments Self Censored To Prevent Being Banned
19 posted on 12/23/2018 7:48:23 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: digger48

This sounds good, if I’m interpreting it correctly.

Appears to be a rebuke to Mueller’s Nazis.


32 posted on 12/23/2018 8:15:03 PM PST by Trumpisourlastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: digger48

There is so little info about this case.

It appears that Mueller is again stepping out of bounds.

I look forward to seeing AAG Whitaker NOT going forward with the case. I pray he makes the correct decision.

I would love to be sure that Mueller’s days are numbered.


36 posted on 12/23/2018 8:28:27 PM PST by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: digger48

This is interesting:

https://twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/1077059383484387328


40 posted on 12/23/2018 8:39:58 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: digger48

Did I miss the breakdown of the decision.

How did the Court rule?


43 posted on 12/23/2018 8:44:50 PM PST by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: digger48

This is ‘what they don’t want you to know about’.


44 posted on 12/23/2018 8:46:42 PM PST by lee martell (AT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: digger48

Is making a ruling on a Sunday unusual? I would certainly think so.


48 posted on 12/23/2018 9:08:26 PM PST by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

p


52 posted on 12/23/2018 9:19:36 PM PST by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: digger48
so why weren't deep staters who failed to comply with Congressional subpoenas fined $5000 a week/
54 posted on 12/23/2018 9:35:31 PM PST by rolling_stone (Hang em slowly don't boil the rope make it a little short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson