They acknowledged his role in the Boston bombing; their defense angle was that the older brother prodded him into it. So you think he and his brother are completely innocent of everything that happened that day, including the killing of Officer Collier.. that it was all perpetrated by someone else?
They = who? The assigned defense lawyer who threw the case, arguing in direct contradiction to his plea?
Again, I assign you that lawyer, I have you convicted for 9/11 on these terms, and no matter how absurd it is to you, a jury will agree because they’ll see only one side of the story, which will not be challenged in any way because your representation is working for the prosecution.
I strongly recommend that you look up what the conditions for a fair trial are and compare it to what happened here. There is no resemblance whatsoever.