Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The FL supreme court gets it right.

Bravo!

The 1998 citizen-ratified constitutional amendment is another example of why voters at the polling place have no business enacting statutes or constitutional amendments. When acting en masse, the people are insufficiently deliberative and demonstrably "feel" rather than think. Direct democracy stinks.

1 posted on 01/05/2019 8:43:32 AM PST by Jacquerie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Jacquerie

Agreed. The constitutional amendment process here in Florida has become the tool of the left to override the legislative process and get by amendment what they could never get by properly written law. This is not to say that the legislators are doing their job.


2 posted on 01/05/2019 8:52:32 AM PST by roho (SemperFi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacquerie
But in her dissent, which was joined by Lewis and Quince, Pariente wrote that, with Friday’s decision, “the majority of this (Supreme) Court fails to provide any judicial remedy for the students who are at the center of this lawsuit --- African American students, Hispanic students, economically disadvantaged students, and students who attend school in poorer school districts or attend persistently low-performing schools.”

Just so we're clear about the underlying issue. The left, as always, is trying to mandate equality of outcomes. It has weaponized the lie that all differences in group outcomes are the result of discrimination, overt or (often) subtle and even unintended. It also continues to insist that all such differences can be eradicated if enough money is thrown at the problem. People on the receiving end of this money, i.e. the race hustlers and the educationist blob, can be counted upon to support this approach.

Since there are many reasons for differences in group outcomes, many of which are neither the result of discrimination nor amenable to public policy interventions, the left is demanding an impossibility. This is intentional, though it is important not to acknowledge the impossibility, because the real goal is to transfer power to activist groups and the courts. Unfortunately, it is not possible for any candidate to speak honestly about black academic underachievement and hope to win major office.

If I were running for office, I would take the position that we must stop categorizing people by race and start treating everyone as an individual, period. We should begin by refusing to collect data on racial metrics. Just stop. Go color blind. No exceptions. If we want to create compensatory mechanisms to support students from disadvantaged backgrounds, fine. And as a practical matter, that would be in substantial part a proxy for race. But bottom line: get the would-be dictators with pigment meters out of the schools, institute full school choice to empower parents, celebrate excellence, and let the chips fall where they may, on an entirely color-blind basis.

A perfect solution? No. But since it's not possible to speak honestly about race, it's probably the best we can do.

5 posted on 01/05/2019 9:45:56 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacquerie
Obviously, Pariente is a judicial activist just itching to get in control of the state's educational money and power.

Gotta remember that name so I can vote against her when she is up for reelection (never happens, though. They always get reelected)...

6 posted on 01/05/2019 9:49:38 AM PST by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacquerie
The FL supreme court gets it right. Bravo! The 1998 citizen-ratified constitutional amendment is another example of why voters at the polling place have no business enacting statutes or constitutional amendments. When acting en masse, the people are insufficiently deliberative and demonstrably "feel" rather than think. Direct democracy stinks.

This was passed prior to the FL change to the Constitution of 2006 which required ALL proposed amendments to the FL Constitution require 60% for passage.

The Left hates this and has been trying since to repeal the 60% rule.

10 posted on 01/05/2019 11:07:34 AM PST by VeniVidiVici
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacquerie

A stunningly good decision from a court that can be kangarooesque. Thank God above the communist Gollum lost to DeSantis.


11 posted on 01/05/2019 12:30:23 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacquerie
Direct democracy stinks.

Tell me about it. Constitutional amendment through ballot initiative, largely funded by New York and Kalifornia billionaires, has done a lot to screw up Colorado.

12 posted on 01/05/2019 12:50:45 PM PST by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson