Skip to comments.
Ginsburg missing Supreme Court arguments for 1st time
AP ^
| January 7, 2019
Posted on 01/07/2019 6:36:57 AM PST by Zakeet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
To: Lisbon1940
Harry Reid demonstrated that the rules can be changed. The Dems have declared war on Trump.
41
posted on
01/07/2019 7:35:02 AM PST
by
kabar
To: Zakeet
Terrible justice. Uses international law to form opinions. Speaks out during campaigns which is unethical and doesn’t recuse herself when cases arise involving president she spoke out against. I’ll. Falls asleep. Judges should be retired at 75
42
posted on
01/07/2019 7:36:44 AM PST
by
morphing libertarian
(Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
To: morphing libertarian
Need bipartisan rule. Maybe within 3 months of electionFine, but let's not make the rule until the Dems have the President and Senate.
43
posted on
01/07/2019 7:37:32 AM PST
by
1Old Pro
To: Zakeet
“Work from home” = cabal of lawyers pretend to be her
44
posted on
01/07/2019 7:38:00 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?)
To: Zakeet
Heck, she issued an opinion on a case while she was still in the hospital under heavy meds so why not issue opinions while snoozing?
45
posted on
01/07/2019 9:39:42 AM PST
by
bgill
(CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
To: 1Old Pro
She’s been too ill to serve for many years.
46
posted on
01/07/2019 9:40:14 AM PST
by
bgill
(CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
To: CatOwner
In as much as there will be a hell of a movement to invoke the Biden Rule in 2020, and that Trump may be under a cloud of bogus investigations, RBG’s removal from the SC needs to occur sooner, rather than later.
47
posted on
01/07/2019 12:55:49 PM PST
by
gundog
( Hail to the Chief, bitches!)
To: Lisbon1940
The Democrats said it was unfair to do that the Garland. If an opening in the court occurs before the next election, the GOP should just say they agree that it was unfair, and won’t do it again.
To: Zakeet
She is just practicing yoga.
49
posted on
01/08/2019 8:01:05 PM PST
by
Soros Billions
(Gore is a pussy, Hillary : There's a man for ya)
To: morphing libertarian
Does the rule prevent confirmation or nomination or both? Could the President for example nominate in 2019 and get confirmation in 2020?
50
posted on
01/08/2019 8:05:30 PM PST
by
Soros Billions
(Gore is a pussy, Hillary : There's a man for ya)
To: Soros Billions
It would be up to Lindsay Graham who is now the Chairman of the U S Senate Judiciary Committee.
51
posted on
01/08/2019 8:10:11 PM PST
by
marajade
(Skywalker)
To: Soros Billions
don’t know why not. One thing about trump he will do what he thinks is correct
52
posted on
01/08/2019 8:11:44 PM PST
by
morphing libertarian
(Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson