As I have said before, RGB should be spending what days God has left for her with her family. But she wont be allowed to retire. Dems wont have that.
How many people get two movies released about them while they are still alive?
Is that coincidence, or part of an effort to insure her replacement will — MUST — be in her image (and endorse unlimited abortion)?
“...So, she’s going to work from home...”
You mean-Like Hillary?
I’m good with this. Take a day off RBG’s life and
add it on to President Trumps.
Equality, isn’t it wonderful.
Is she calling in from Sagel Bloomfield Danzansky? It appears to be the premier Jewish establishment in the area.
“That’s right – how about just giving up one of your own days on earth so that Ruth can live longer?”
How about the reverse? How about adding to our lives a day at a time by subtracting them from Ruthie? This is just further confirmation that Liberalism is a mental disorder.
Why does she to really need to hear oral arguments anyway? She knows how she will vote before the case even hits the court. However Kagan votes, all they have to do is say “ditto”.
Bless her heart.
Hopefully for her sake, this latest event will open her eyes to the Lord. Else wise, all she has accumulated on this Earth fame, wealth, whatever, is for not. At 85, she likely doesn’t have long but it is her choice to Believe or not.
If she is gonna crook, Let’s hope she takes up the seat until the day before the decisions are voted on then she assumes room temperature.
So, she is too sick to do her job, but she can still vote?
Seems odd.
That’s because Leftists deny the existence of God.
They cannot accept that life on this planet is finite, nor that there is one beyond it.
If they gave up the rest of their Lives she could live forever.
Life is a Twilight Zone Show.
I understand there are plans to keep her severed head alive. N.I.C.E. says it has the technology and that RGB can indefinitely continue her designated role in the destruction of the Republic.
This was my questions when it appeared that McCain’s illness took his health but more importantly took his cognitive functions, and it’s my question now. I’m not taking a side on this but I think it needs to be answered and applied evenly regardless of party or of the office;
When a representative (or appointee) has irreversibly lost their own personal ability to function in their office, but have not (yet) deceased, should subordinates and substitutes be permitted to function in their place, if that is their wish?
Moreover, how would we know it is their wish to have others serve in their stead, and how would we (or they) be able to validate that those serving in their place are doing so as capably and in the spirit of the way that the representative or appointee would.
Again, I’m not coming down on a side on this, but I am going to add on jab, and that is I believe people would be treating the question about a SCJ capacity to serve if the perception of their politics were on the other side.
SIX MORE YEARS?
She’ll eventually run out of sick leave and have to call in dead.