I thought we’d gotten rid of McAmnesty.
Political and national SUICIDE!!!
Then (maybe) conversations about other things can begin and ... we'll see what happens.
That's how the Democrats play. That's basically what Tip O 'Neil did to Reagan on immigration.
It would be a terrible idea for one big reason: It gets Congress off the hook for doing their damn job.
I don’t know that it would be such a bad deal. There’s no way the illegals that are here are going to be deported. The status quo is that they are pouring in and aren’t gonna leave. Under Lindsey Grahamnesty’s alleged proposal, we could at least stem the flow.
Anus Pundit. Come on!
Will this be a plan from the old GrAmnesty or the new and imoroved GrahamNasty?
“No ending to an Ann-Coulter-led push for a big fight over the wall would be more ironic than Trump agreeing to amnestize a few millions
M O R E
DREAMers to resolve it.”
Amnesty is not an answer
I’ve never had a problem with legalizing Dreamers. It’s the Democrats who most don’t want that as they are the literally poster children for the rest.
Just say NO to any amnesty bill. We are trying to stop the flow of illegals; not give them a reason to do it.
No DACA amnesty without ending visa lottery and chain migration.
Whatever happens, deal, compromise, National Emergency needs to be NOW!
If the ‘rats get a chance, and they might after 2020, they will defund the wall.
If the Pres. declares a National Emergency the ‘rats will judge shop and get an injunction the Pres should ignore any court order.
Can he divert Foreign Aid money toward the wall?
Take a billion here and there.
Trump has actually already offered this to the Dems, and it’s on record...so Graham is just trying to get this through for him.
My guess is that while Trump can do the wall through the national emergency route, he’d ratther not. So he’s giving the Dems one last chance.
They won’t take it, of course, but then he can say he tried.
I need one of you Legal experts to help me with this question. Assuming that President Trump declares a National Emergency on the Border and uses Defense/etc. funds to build the wall and the Democrats find a 9th Circuit Judge to halt that, is there any legal method for Trump’s attorneys to fast track that decision to the Supreme Court for a final decision rather than waiting the slow process through the Appeals Courts? There has to be a way of circumventing the methodical slow, slower and slowest process through the Appeals courts on a National Security Matter. Help me you legal experts.
What does bother me is there will never be any recall or mention when previous government shut downs comparison impacts get reviewed over the impact they had. Of this;
Not dare refer to the most costly and disgraceful results from a “shutdown” that happened during Nixon’s presidency. Caused by the democrats refusal to stand by the Vietnamese effort to remain independent by refusing them air support and supplemental funding of arm supplies which would have prevented that loss and that humiliating disgraceful evacuation of our Saigon embassy.
Which quickly then resulted in a multitude of Vietnamese being slaughtered and the sacrifices of thousands of our armed forces paying with their lives 58,000 assisting them in their fight for freedom disgraced.
Build the freakin’ wall, then decide who stays and who goes.
Trump offered this deal more than a year ago and was turned down.
The Deal will resemble Reagan’s disastrous ‘Amnesty’ for security. We got Amnesty and no ‘Security’. The same will happen again.
Everything AllahPundit writes is designed to undermine Trump.
Every word.
First ask the President if you can help and when he says,”NO” go away