Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Singapore, Vietnam shortlisted for second Trump-Kim summit: Report
Channel News Asia ^ | January 11, 2019

Posted on 01/10/2019 8:28:13 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Shortlisted venues for a second summit between United States President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un are likely to include Singapore and Vietnam, South Korean media reported on Friday (Jan 11).

“(The venues you should pay attention to) are those mentioned by media including Vietnam, Singapore and Hawaii,” a South Korean foreign affairs ministry official told the Korean Herald, speaking on condition of anonymity.

“But Hawaii is said to be an unrealistic location as it doesn’t have a North Korean embassy there,” the report quoted another official as saying.

Although the South Korean government hoped the truce village of Panmunjom - located in the Demilitarised Zone between North and South Korea - would host the second summit, this was unlikely, one of the officials told the Korean Herald.

“We would like to hold the meeting at Panmunjom, but the probability of this becoming a reality seems to be slim,” one of the officials told the news organisation.

The leaders of North and South Korea held a meeting at the truce village in April last year - only the third of its kind since the end of the 1950-53 Korean War.

South Korean President Moon Jae-in on Thursday said the second United States-North Korea summit would take place "soon".

Meanwhile, it was reported earlier this week that US State Department officials recently met several times with their North Korean counterparts in Hanoi to discuss planning the second summit between the two countries, fuelling speculation the Vietnamese capital could play host to the event.

Trump later told reporters that the two countries were "negotiating a location" for a second summit, and that this would be announced "probably in the not too distant future".

During their historic first summit last June, Kim reaffirmed his "firm and unwavering commitment to complete denuclearisation of the Korean Peninsula", stated in a joint document signed by him and Trump.

Trump in turn committed to provide security guarantees to North Korea. The document did not state what those guarantees might be.

Ahead of the Singapore summit last year, a South Korean presidential official told reporters that the choice of Singapore as a venue was as in part because it was within reasonable flight time and distance from Pyongyang.

Kim's personal Ilyushin-62M jet has a maximum range of 10,000km - putting Singapore, Hanoi and Hawaii all well within range.

However his additional Ilyushin-76 cargo plane cannot fly more than 3,000km without refuelling if carrying a full load.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Japan; Politics/Elections; Russia; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: china; hawaii; japan; korea; maga; pyongyang; republicofkorea; russia; singapore; vietnam

1 posted on 01/10/2019 8:28:13 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I might be biased, because I have now lived in Vietnam for just about as long as Trump has been president.

But I (strongly) think this would be the perfect place to meet.

I was quite pleasantly surprized coming here. To tell the truth I did not really know what to expect.

It is very nice. It is not like Thailand or Cambodia. Or China. Or anywhere else actually.

But I like the place. Quite a lot actually.

I think they might consider this a real good location.

Just saying.


2 posted on 01/10/2019 8:41:31 PM PST by cba123 ( Toi la nguoi My. Toi bay gio o Viet Nam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Hawaii should be out - it's American soil - too symbolic. Singapore is a nod to China. Vietnam, eh. Philippines would be better and could be dual purpose for a Trump visit.
3 posted on 01/10/2019 8:46:51 PM PST by blueplum ( "...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Sorry folks. It might be just me but I have deep trouble giving Viet Nam any creds.

But the good news, for you who think it is good, those of us who fought (for nothing) over there will all soon be gone.


4 posted on 01/11/2019 12:24:47 AM PST by ImpBill (Conservative little "l" libertarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImpBill

We had wars in many nations.


5 posted on 01/11/2019 12:37:28 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
And your point is? BTW thanks for your service brother. I wasn't directing this towards you. Just making a statement concerning how I felt, to thread.
6 posted on 01/11/2019 6:47:08 AM PST by ImpBill (Conservative little "l" libertarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson