Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: harpu

Already redirected my $200 to their new venture...
+++++
Well I’m only in for $100 but I am likely to turn down the refund and support the new plan.

My biggest fear: The money will be burned up paying the lawyers to defend against Dem lawsuits to prevent “this unlawful, unconstitutional and anti-environmental construction project.


38 posted on 01/12/2019 10:03:16 AM PST by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: InterceptPoint

Private landowners building private barriers with private money is neither illegal or unconstitutional. Almost all private property is fenced in one fashion or another.

I do expect environmental lawsuits, but that will just drain the enviros of ready cash as well since they won’t get their legal costs paid by the government and they won’t win, the bollard design is already well researched and approved for low environmental impact and the enviros may not even make it past the standing test because its private property.

And there are some very competent pro bono property rights like Pacific legal institute who will likely enter the fray. That will be delicious.


56 posted on 01/12/2019 12:24:28 PM PST by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson