[rjsimmon]

For the 99% that do not drink and drive, how is this even relevant?

[mplc51]

My nephew had one ordered by the court. His kids blew in for him to start it.

[nesnah]

“For the 99% that do not drink and drive, how is this even relevant?”

---

It’s not. You just get the privilege of paying for lawmakers being do-gooders.

[Notthereyet]

“For the 99% that do not drink and drive, how is this even relevant?”
________________________________________________

This is very relevant. I’m guessing that almost 95% of people killed or maimed are NOT the drunk driver. There are most likely many, many, many families whose mothers/fathers/children/other relatives who would still be alive if a car was NOT started by the drunk driver.
________________________________________________

Strange as it sounds, this is actually a good idea. It does alarm me that a Democrat suggested it. That, I will admit.

[discostu]

Not the best science in the world. Did you use mouthwash in the last hour or so? Guess what.

[Fresh Wind]

For the 99% that do not drink and drive, how is this even relevant?

It will raise the price of the car with something that could potentially malfunction and make the car unusable at an inconvenient time.