I recall being taught history in 1962 in grade school with the headline being “the coming of the white people”.
American history started there. Since that’s who 90% of the populace were then, and mostly the descendants of those people.
Maybe the “supremacist” label is offensive since it connotes slavery, but if a nation of people of the same ethnicity (isn’t that what it means?) gets together and says “we rule ourselves, and don’t take orders from anyone else” isn’t that technically “supremacist”?
I know of no one without Han Chinese genetics making rules for anyone in China. So are they Chinese Supremacists, or just Chinese? No one seems to question that.
And of course we all know what the Africans of Zimbabwe, Kenya, Uganda and now South Africa feel about the any rule by whites....zip, nada, none.
So they are ipso facto Black Supremacists.
That is apparently considered utterly normal by the entire planet.
“Maybe the “supremacist” label is offensive since it connotes slavery”
Go to Oslo, go to Kinshasa. Then get back to us.
......... well said.