SpongeBob, "Squirrels are so dumb!"
Posted on 01/17/2019 5:49:21 AM PST by SJackson
After eight years of Donald Trump, Americans will certainly be ready for some 'radical' change.
Donald Trump's shocking victory in the 2016 presidential race caused liberals across the United States to question whether the country was indeed ready for a woman president. Since then, there has been much speculation about various female politicians and celebrities running for office, including Senator Elizabeth Warren, Senator Kamala Harris, Oprah, Michelle Obama, and others. There have even been rumours that Hillary Clinton might run again.
I, however, don't see any of these women making it to the White House. I think the first female president of the US will be New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (or AOC as she has come to be known). It may take her another six years to get there, but the youngest woman elected to the US Congress will win the presidency. Here is how and why. Alexandria is not Hillary
Hillary Clinton won the popular vote in the 2016 election but lost key swing states and, under our complicated and arguably unfair Electoral College system, this meant losing the presidency.
But the biggest political upset in recent US history cannot simply be blamed on the unfairness of the electoral system, under which countless Democrats managed to defeat opponents stronger, and more experienced, than Donald Trump.
Clinton lost the election because she failed to convince working-class voters that she would be able to understand and address their growing grievances. While she started her journey as a young, educated, idealistic feminist believing in social justice and equality, over the course of her life in the political limelight, she (and her husband) made a fortune of over $50m, including $21m in speaking fees she was paid by Wall Street businesses and other interest groups. She gradually became an unrelatable poster-child of corporate America's greed. This, combined with the proliferation of fake news and misinformation provided by Trump's campaign were the proverbial "nails in the coffin" for her presidential bid. ADVERTISING inRead invented by Teads OPINION Where does the future of the American left lie? Rachel Gilmer by Rachel Gilmer
Unlike Clinton and most politicians for that matter, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rejected donations from corporate political action committees, or PACs. She didn't take millions from Wall Street and then preach to blue-collar Americans that she understood their struggles. This helped her not to be perceived as a member of the Washington establishment like Clinton and her peers Senators Elizabeth Warren and Kirsten Gillibrand, for example.
Moreover, Clinton just offered middle-of-the-road policies that simply promised more of the same. By contrast, Ocasio-Cortez, as an out and proud democratic socialist, advocated for federally guaranteed jobs and "Medicare-For-All," called for tuition-free public colleges and the dismantling of the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. With this, AOC made it clear that she offers a different kind of politics that is unadulterated by corporate and lobbyist connections. This is, in fact, what helped her defeat a 20-year incumbent and the fourth-ranking House Democrat, Joe Crowley, in the Democratic race for New York's 14th Congressional District.
After she was sworn into Congress, she continued talking about progressive policies, calling for a return to John F Kennedy's 70 percent tax on the wealthiest Americans and supporting a "Green New Deal", a proposed economic programme addressing climate change and inequality. If Ocasio-Cortez continues down this path and successfully rejects cooptation by PACs, working-class Americans across party lines would undoubtedly be moved to vote for her.
AOC is also a master of grassroots organising and, while her actions convey that she is in touch with the challenges ordinary Americans face, her greatest asset may be her ability to connect with them in a way that feels genuine and not contrived. Millennials, for example, find AOC more relatable than any other potential presidential candidate. With her 2.37 million Twitter followers and growing, she is a skilled social media user who knows how to connect and communicate with the younger generation and will certainly be able to secure their vote. And in the coming decade, it increasingly seems that it will be the millennials who will become the most important voting bloc within the US electorate.
And finally, AOC was also able to capture the attention of the press and has already shown much skill in fending off public attacks. Even before she was sworn into office on January 3, conservatives had already launched a smear campaign against her, which is indicative of how much she scares them.
First, there was noise about the house she grew up in in a New York suburb; then much discussion about designer clothes she wore during a 2018 photo shoot. Just after her swearing-in, the right-wing news site The Daily Caller posted a fake picture of her in a bathtub. And then the conservative media tried to troll her with a video on the internet of her dancing in her college days. But this turned out to be a media boost for the freshman Congresswoman and she trolled them right back by making a wildly popular video of herself dancing into her Congress office.
With the election of Trump and AOC's rise to stardom, one thing has become undoubtedly clear: US voters are desperate for new politics and fresh faces who can offer real change. And with her charisma, presence and political acumen, Ocasio-Cortez is able to tap into these sentiments. To put it in Trump's words, Ocasio-Cortez is a "winner", she is "winning".
Her popularity in the press parallels Trump's during his presidential bid in 2016 when he proved true the cliché "any press is good press". Yes, it was thanks to the media's obsession with him, both on the right and the left, that he remained a constant figure in the public eye, which ultimately paved the way for the unimaginable to happen - his win over Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election.
The same is already proving true for AOC. She is the Democrat that Republicans (and even some Democrats) love to hate, and she will be all the better for it. AOC will run in 2024 after eight years of Trump
Alexandria is unlikely to run in 2020 and challenge Trump because she will not meet the constitutional requirement of being 35 by then.
The Democratic Party is likely to nominate someone like former Texas Congressman Beto O'Rourke, who will stick to the traditional Democratic centre-left talking points: "compromise, compromise, compromise". If that happens, Trump will certainly bully him into a corner on the campaign trail and during the debates and will go on to win the 2020 presidential election, to the despair and shame of millions of Americans.
Another Trump presidency will certainly drag the country into deeper political, social and economic crises and will convince disillusioned voters once and for all that the Donald was never the man who could or even wanted to "drain the swamp". It could finally be the wake-up call for millions of Americans to realise that they need to try something drastically different - something "radical". That something, as Ocasio-Cortez has repeatedly pointed out, could be what has already been done successfully in Scandinavian countries, for example.
At the same time, these five years will also give AOC the time to understand how Washington works, build her political profile and prove herself as a house representative. She will also quietly make more allies in the Democratic Party and after her two-year-term as congresswoman is over, she may choose to move up the political ladder by running for office as a senator for her home state of New York, in order to broaden her political experience before a run for president in 2024.
Yes, it will take all of that for Ocasio-Cortez to win the 2024 Democratic nomination. I would even venture to predict that she will run on a ticket with a female vice-presidential candidate, perhaps Senator Kamala Harris, if the forces that are the Democratic National Committee (DNC) permit such a scandal. Don't forget how the DNC buried Senator Bernie Sanders in his run for the nomination in 2016. But after eight years of Trumpism, I believe that America will make sure that doesn't happen again to AOC.
But apart from resistance within the DNC, perhaps the greatest challenge Ocasio-Cortez will face along the way to 2024 is remaining true to herself and her principles and withstanding the ineluctable and incessant weathering of the lobbyists who effectively run Congress behind the scenes. In her 60 Minutes interview with Anderson Cooper, she admitted she is worried about how Washington would change her because it inevitably changes everyone.
If she manages to "survive" Washington and emerge stronger, the 2024 Democratic nomination for president definitely has "Ocasio-Cortez" written all over it. I, for one, will definitely vote for her.
Editor's note: The article has been updated to clarify that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez cannot run in the 2020 presidential race because of her age.
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Carli Pierson is an attorney and writer. She lives and teaches international law in the Yucatan Peninsula, in Mexico.
Occasional-Cortex is an idiot. Just like Barry Soetoro. We need to discredit her NOW, before her string-pullers impose her on us like they did with Bath House Barry.
stop using the Abbreviation
Call her by some nick name. Sandy is her high school nickname
freeze her, isolate her and ridicule her.
If she ever becomes president, she will be the last president.
I expect eight years of Trump to make this a strong and vibrant country, with more and more people actually able to live the American dream.
And I suppose in 2024 the Democrats will run on the platform: “You what would be even better? Communism!!”
Shes got great gums, tho...
Hillary Clinton won the popular vote in the 2016 election but lost key swing states and, under our complicated and arguably unfair Electoral College system, this meant losing the presidency.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This article was in al jazeera. It makes sense they don’t understand how our country works.
She’s a flash in the pan.
When the great reckoning comes, Ocasio-Cortez will no longer be relevant.
Well, if someone like Justin Turd-Owe can become Prime Minister of Canada in a so-called “Election” that was more akin to a coronation, and with no other qualifications than a famous last name, and two generations of women (namely Baby Boomers and Millennials) sighing and swooning about how “dreamy” he is, I suppose anything is possible. X.x
Yup, I call her a Roman candle.
We can’t dismiss her because of her brainless appeal to brainless voters (we saw a complete incompetent get elected to the White House twice in 2008 and 2012) but we can ridicule her as she richly deserves.
She has a B.A. in Islamic World Studies from DePaul University in 2006. She received her Juris Doctorate in 2012 from Nova Southeastern University's Shepard Broad Law Center, cum laude, with a concentration in international law.
Prior to law school, Carli worked as a writer for WSVN in Miami and as an intern for CNN’s Chicago bureau."
Not even close. She has the academic and professional background that will get you a job at Starbucks. Remember that Barry S. had big name baccalaureate and law degrees, was “President” of the Harvard Law Review, was a world traveler, and had been a “law professor.” AOC has a much smaller frame upon which to build a mythology. She will be old news in 2024.
This is nuts...SHe’ll be voted out come the next time she’s up for re-election.
Come first primary debate, she’ll look like the idiot she is...
...never happen.
The Rats keep saying that HRC “won” the popular vote...like they did with Gore in 2000. Neither won a majority of the popular vote (even if we pretend there were no fraudulent votes counted). In all of American history only one candidate who lost because of the electoral college actually had over 50% of the popular vote...Samuel Tilden in 1876. Even in that case, if we knew all the details, he may have gotten to 51% only because of voter suppression in the South (Democrats preventing freedmen from voting).
I agree. Though I think she might have a problem if Joe Crowley or another dem want’s the position. Badmouthing her party’s leaders is a good way to get primaried, and I think she’s forgotten she was elected on very low turnout.
Train her to stick to reading her lines, like Barry did, and she COULD get the Presidency. Do NOT underestimate her. She generates enthusiasm among the Dem base.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.