From the Minneapolis (Red) Star Tribune: “I coach a predominantly black inner city high school team,” Walker wrote on his Facebook posting. “We go out to a rural area in Jordan, MN and this is there. Please explain how and why this is appropriate at a high school basketball game?”
Coach Walker, why don’t you explain why it’s inappropriate? You freakin racist moron! Trying his best to play the victim card and race card and whatever other card he can throw at it.
Does Coach Walker give opportunites to white players or is he a racist? If he is he needs to be fired and perhaps jailed.
Oh, and while you're in a "reviewing mode", Superintendent Helgerson, please take time to question the actions of the adult leader who allows the children he coaches to act so ungrateful toward our great country?
I personally would prefer that we keep ALL politics out of sports. But the NFL already sort of took care of that.
For the same reason it is appropriate to display Tommy John's ERA at a professional baseball game. (John 3:16) We used to call it "Freedom of Speech."
Now, coach, go cower in your safe area.
Just our little way of saying FU Minneapostan
Big kudos to the kids and their banner !
And explain why when Obama was president it was ok to have young students sing a song about Obama?
It’s inappropriate because the suburban white kids’ dads work for a living so they can buy a banner for their kids to take to the school games. The inner-city kids don’t have dads, so they can’t buy banners...and that’s unfair. Or something like that.
I managed a company in Louisville and we made daily deliveries of our product to blue-collar sales/manufacturing businesses. We delivered to whites, hispanics, russians, etc. all over the city. Louisville was roughly 40% black and there was a predominantly black part of town but I only ever had 1 black-owned business as a customer and he was in his 70’s. The younger blacks didn’t open businesses and they didn’t work. My warehouse was right on the edge of the black part of town and I never had a black applicant for work, not one, in almost two years.