Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Secret Agent Man
"If she had been born AFTER they had both been here five years and applied and received citizenship, she’d be eligible."

She was born in the US. The status of her parents has nothing to do with her eligibility.

169 posted on 01/21/2019 2:46:54 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]


To: mlo

Thread regarding the topic of eligibility:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3721731/posts?q=1&;page=1


170 posted on 01/21/2019 3:00:32 PM PST by research99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

To: mlo

That is absolutely not correct.


175 posted on 01/21/2019 4:26:47 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

To: mlo

The 14th amendment did not alter or modify the meaning of Article II, section 1, clause 5 with regard to the POTUS eligibility requirement in any way, shape form or fashion.

Conflating the two does not create a constitutional amendment that would actually do so.


189 posted on 01/22/2019 7:58:39 AM PST by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

To: mlo

That is where you have it wrong.... FRiend. You need to read up on this.

A mere anchor baby cannot be President. And the entire “concept” that they are even citizens is under serious legal examination.

Natural Born is described in the Constitution, and in the Federalst Papers. Not a globalist. Nor even a German child born of an Indian and German parents while in the US.


198 posted on 01/22/2019 10:19:42 AM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson