News Executive: Democrats’ Arrogant Intransigence Could Bite Them If This Shutdown Drags On

Townhall.com ^ | January 21, 2019 | Matt Vespa

[Kaslin]

So, could this shutdown end up hurting Democrats again? Both sides are not budging. The partisan divide on immigration is the equivalent of the width of the Atlantic and Pacific oceans combined. President Trump is trying to make good on his promise to secure the border, a key campaign promise. The Democrats, wanting to take their new House majority for a spin, are not playing ball. They were elected to block and fight this administration. They’re not giving one-cent. President Trump recently offered a deal to break the logjam. A three-year extension to DACA recipients, plus more protections to those with Temporary Protected Status in exchange for part of his border wall projected to cost around $5.7 billion. Democrats have rejected the deal outright. They have no counteroffer. And if Democrats come up with one, it’ll be straight trash. The Democratic Party is more concerned with scoring points than re-opening the government. They say they want to negotiate, but have nothing to offer. 

Trump has to deliver on something regarding the wall, he based his 2016 campaign on border security. Democrats can’t cave on a key Trump initiative at the outset of their new House majority. And Trump can’t cave to House Democrats. There is no end in sight, but can Democrats get a face full of buckshot in this fight? Yes, Trump and the GOP are being blamed more…because what else is new. But voters agree that there is a border crisis, and support for the wall has risen. With the government shutdown, you have Speaker Pelosi screwing around with the State of the Union, virtually disinviting Trump over nonsensical security concerns and her party absconded to Puerto Rico during the shutdown. So, spare me the ‘those poor government workers’ lectures from the Left; they don’t care about them. RealClearPolitics’ Tom Bevan said last week that Democratic intransigence could bite them in the end. And while this deal offered by Trump isn’t the best, and certainly not warmly received by his camp, it’s at least something to go on for future negotiations.

Then again, both sides see their side winning in the polls. Democrats see the blame portion, while the GOP and Trump see how voters back border security. As this drags on, we’ll see who gets torched:

People are in favor of border security. People also don't want the government shutdown. Polling right now shows that people are holding Trump responsible but I think Democrats are starting to run the risk of intransigence. Not even showing up to bargain at all and even arrogance, being on junkets in Puerto Rico while the government is shut down. That's not a good look for Democrats and that may end up hurting them in the long run if this continues to go on. Trump still has a national emergency in his back pocket, he may use it if it gets to the point where he has no other options because he just can't capitulate.

[Charles Martel]

If they were paid early they’ll spend early, it’s already gone.

Of course. IIRC, it was during the last shutdown that several states had EBT system "glitches" that resulted in near riots at a number of Walmart locations. I always thought that must've been a "shot across the bow" by the Obama administration to get the Republicans in Congress to cave (which they did, shortly afterwards).

Are Nancy and Chuck more resistant to the same pressure? I think we may find out soon.

[mistfree]

“I hope he starts gutting departments by releasing furloughed gubmint workers this week.”

You and me both! Oh, and my wife is furloughed.
Go for it Donald.

[Teacher317]

Or...$1 out of every $1000 of government spending...

Pres Trump already proposed $16bn in cuts to the military budget... so the "how are you going to pay for it?" nonsense hasn't come out.

[Ronniesque]

$1 out of $1000 was another way of expressing how little the funding cost was (example of what 0.1% is).