If the cartels could buy a President of Mexico for $100 million, why could they not also buy an anti-Wall position by a party in the USA..?
Posted on 01/22/2019 8:03:06 PM PST by bitt
Its one reason.
But there are multiple reasons.
I doubt elected officials are going to risk prison and disgrace by taking money from Mexican drug cartels - the Democrats just hope to turn every state blue by allowing illegals to pour in.
They don't expect to be caught, because members of their political party control the courts and the DAs, as well as law enforcement.
And lets “up” our sophistication people. It isn’t a car full of Mexicans in a Monte Carlo or an F-150 pulling up with a bag of cash to Nancy Pelosi’s house.
No, the cartels put money in banks. Banks that knowing are laundering it. Dope banks like HSBC (literally -founded- as a dope bank), Wachovia, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Deutsche Bank, etc...Hundreds of millions, even billions.
Bankers then meet with Democrats in a local restaurant, or at some vacation resort and discuss their “financial support” for the politicans.
We are literally run by international sociopath criminals.
By the way, the cartels latest item to smuggle for cash is PEOPLE. Everyone crossing represents 3 or 4 thousand dollars paid to the cartel. Think you can just cross the border on their turf for free?
“I doubt elected officials are going to risk prison and disgrace by taking money from Mexican drug cartels -”
Right. They will never meet some Mexican with face tattoos. They take the cash from bank executives, who take it from Mexicans with face tattoos. And from Mexicans like Nieto and Fox who need to deposit their bribes.
Also, since the 1960s, the CIA has used the dope trade as an integral part of it’s black budget.
That is an act of war.
It has to do with getting voters to the polls, registered or not.
This data come from Judicial Watch’s Election Integrity Project. The group looked at data from 2011 to 2015 produced by the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, along with data from the federal Election Assistance Commission.
As reported by the National Review’s Deroy Murdock, who did some numbers-crunching of his own, “some 3.5 million more people are registered to vote in the U.S. than are alive among America’s adult citizens. Such staggering inaccuracy is an engraved invitation to voter fraud.”
Murdock counted Judicial Watch’s state-by-state tally and found that 462 U.S. counties had a registration rate exceeding 100% of all eligible voters. That’s 3.552 million people, who Murdock calls “ghost voters.” And how many people is that? There are 21 states that don’t have that many people.
Guess where they came from?
rwood
Interesting translation;
Silver or lead.
Say it loud and say it often because it is true.
If the cartels could buy a President of Mexico for $100 million, why could they not also buy an anti-Wall position by a party in the USA..?
That and New Yorks abortion at birth law both semester like acts of war.
Not a surprise,problem is you have to prove it,who doesn’t believe with the amount of money in that there are not those on the take
These are the neo Nazi’s. We can not let them ever control our nukes again.
bkmk
And Pubbies want the cheap labor.
Whither Ryan? Think he was on the take?
Might have been.
“They also appreciate the legalization of drugs here.”
How so?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.