Douglas Murray: Have We Had Enough Diversity? (19 min video)

YouTube ^ | Jul 30, 2017 | Douglas Murray

[aquila48]

Douglas Murray ("The Strange Death of Europe") does a superb job debunking the diversity insanity. (19 min video)

[skr]

bfl

[Crucial]

The problem is forced diversity.

[Dagnabitt]

This guy is a treasure. The traitorous elites of Europe aren’t fond of his views.

[Hostage]

The Brits are going through another Neville Chamberlain moment where they are allowing themselves to be 'distracted' with talk leading nowhere except to the next day. In short, they lack courage to confront the Islamic menace. They are spineless and prefer to beat on themselves rather than unite against an enemy.

History of Islam exhibits solutions, relatively recent, in the edicts and policies of Kemalism born of Turkey's Atatürk (Mustafa Kemal Atatürk) of the early 20th century. Atatürk alone was arguably the force behind Turkey's modernization and merging with European powers. Atatürk effectively turned Islam inward so that battles of the soul took place inwardly to one's conscience rather than outwardly to the infidel. The infidel in Atatürk's world was the self and control of the self to the discipline of Islam.

In short, Atatürk administered, and necessarily in brutal fashion, a lesson made to the child, you may not control others, you may only control yourself. This brought about a peaceful and acceptable social behavior among those adhering to Islamic religion. Atatürk himself was secular but realized that the laggard Muslim would never be as strong in the western civilization sense unless Islam was reformed and domesticated.

Atatürk's reform solutions are needed today but Atatürk could only force this reform through massive brutal crackdown dominance which is what the defeated Muslim will accept as the will of Allah in much the same way that ancient Chinese dynasties observed 'The Mandate of Heaven' as the guiding principle allowing for rule.

The Muslim must be harshly defeated to accept it as the will of Allah. The Brits, however, are apathetic and appear weak. They fear their own Tommy Robinson's in the shadows, that they won't be able to control the dogs of war once released. They'd rather not be bothered by it and are annoyed by those who are bullied by Islam to the point of raising the Islamic menace into social discussions.

To these ignorant and apathetic Brits, the care of their garden is what's important. A bloke in the next community who dares to speak out against the crimes and stifling boundaries set by political correctness aligned with Muslin hooligans, against the loss of free speech and the pathogenic change to British cultural traditions, that bloke is obviously part of the problem, a troublemaker to those who want their quiet time. If one can't handle the problems of these Muslim people in one's neighborhood, it's no one's fault but their own. Ergo, leave me alone, stop bothering me with YOUR problems with Muslims. You are obviously incompetent and have become a troublemaker.

[ml/nj]

self ping

[saintgermaine]

There is an old adage which states in so many words “United we stand, divided we fall” So far it has never failed and you can take this to the bank. To anyone who wants this country to fail. just keep on pushing diversity.

[Max in Utah]

“Diversity” comes from division, a separation of a whole into disconnected parts. The goal of our enemies is to divide and conquer the United States.

[bert]

I’ve been watching the program Body Guard.

It protrays the UK as terminally diverse.

American liberals have no real ideas beyond what they can copy from the uk

[Robert DeLong]

Good to know that there are some that still recognize that diversity is destroying their nation.

[yoe]

I Agree. (United States Illegal Alien Crime Report) Tell your friends about this site....I realize, I may be 'late to the party'.

[aquila48]

“The Brits are going through another Neville Chamberlain moment where they are allowing themselves to be ‘distracted’ with talk leading nowhere except to the next day. In short, they lack courage to confront the Islamic menace.”

It isn’t just Britain - it’s the whole western world with the possible exception of eastern Europe.

As for Turkey, Ataturk liberal ideas has is quickly being undone by Erdogan’s fundamentalism and desire for a caliphate.

And the threat to the west isn’t just cultural/religious but racial as well. Importing millions of africans with significantly lower average IQ is going to bring to Europe all the racial diversity joys we’re experiencing in the US.

[Hostage]

The mention of Atatürk was to inform viewers of history, a history that actually worked until it was undone by contemporary Radical Islam.

There are reasonable Muslims in Turkey who grew up in families that experienced Atatürk’s Kemelism. They cannot stand Erdogan and they currently have no alternative. One of Erdogan’s powerful opponents Fethullah ‘Feta’ Gulen is a narcotics trafficker aligned with Hillary Clinton where he stashes in Malaysian banks 2+ billion USD for her among his 40+ billion.

The larger point is the Turks do have a legacy of secularism and also had Kemelism policy for their religious groups. Kemelism allowed Christians and Jews to live peacefully in Turkey while respecting the Christian monuments and history while at the same time allowing the Muslim population to carry on.

So there is precedent. But Atatürk was not able to do this by persuasion alone. He had to defeat Islam and humiliate them so they would accept defeat as the will of Allah.

The same scenario happened in Iran. At one time Iran had a large advanced middle class that attracted diverse groups. But no more. There are however large groups there that see what happened and are positioning to rid the society of those practices that have made their country a hellhole.

It’s important to understand the detailed history in order to plan for the elimination of Radical Islam. Those who plan for war and peace must understand history, what worked, what didn’t.