Posted on 01/24/2019 3:23:35 AM PST by a little elbow grease
How did we ever let them get away with calling it the right to choose instead of the right to murder/kill?
Exactly.
Official School Records Support Claims That Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) Married Her Brother
Minnesota state Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-60B) currently leads the race to fill the federal House seat being vacated by Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN). Immediately after being elected to her current seat in 2016, Omar faced allegations — soon backed by a remarkable amount of evidence — that she had married her own brother in 2009, and was still legally his wife. They officially divorced in December 2017.
The motivation for the marriage remains unclear. However, the totality of the evidence points to possible immigration fraud and student loan fraud.
Rep. Omar has stated that she did marry “British citizen” Ahmed Nur Said Elmi in 2009, though the allegation that he is her brother is “absurd and offensive.”
Below, exclusive new evidence — from official archived high school records and corroborating sources — strongly supports the claim that Ahmed Nur Said Elmi is indeed her brother.
This hate-filled scum married her own brother----she was obsessed with getting into our country.
Given this "peace-loving" scumbag's propensity for fraud, it is imperative that we determine:
(A) her membership in violent Somali and Muslim organizations advocating the overthrow of the US govt,
(B) her knowledge of groups that pulled off the Minn daycare thievery, and,
(C) whether the daycare fraud money financed her campaign,
(d) the number of US govt checks she is cashing now or has cashed in the past.
Americans demand this person be removed from OUR Congress.
This woman is adept at finagling her identity.....how many identities is she using now or used in the past?
Is she using multiple identities to cheat taxpayers....collecting US freebies under multiple identities?
Universal Program for Subsidized Phones for Low Income (ObamaPhones),
Housing Assistance---they get $1000, only use $400, taxpayers pay the rest;
EBT Food Stamps (SNAP),
ObamaCare Subsidies for Immigrants,
ObamaCare Subsidies for Low Income, Medicaid,
TANF Welfare,
Energy Assistance,
IRS-EITC,
General Assistance Cash,
Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP),
Assets for Independence,
School Lunch Block Grant,
Job Assistance,
Job Training,
Minority Job Assistance,
Job Relocation,
Woman Infants and Children's Program,
Refugee Jobs Program,
Needy Families Cash Assistance,
Migrant Education Grants,
Title One Grants to Local Education Authorities,
Social Security for Refugees
All of this also applies to her family, friends and staffers.
I want to see this libel suit happen. Rejoicing over “threatened” libel suits only lasts until coffee.
The federal statute commonly known as the Westfall Act accords federal employees absolute immunity from tort claims arising out of acts undertaken in the course of their official duties, 28 U. S. C. §2679(b)(1), and empowers the Attorney General to certify that a federal employee sued for wrongful or negligent conduct “was acting within the scope of his office or employment at the time of the incident out of which the claim arose,” §2679(d)(1), (2). Upon such certification, the United States is substituted as defendant in place of the employee, and the action is thereafter governed by the Federal Tort Claims Act. If the action commenced in state court, the Westfall Act calls for its removal to a federal district court, and renders the Attorney General’s certification “conclusiv[e] ... for purposes of removal.” §2679(d)(2).
Barnes explained all that on Breitbart this morning. She would be okay if she were acting in her capacity as a Representative in her own district against a public figure.
This is different. These are private citizens, they are minors and they don’t live in her district. That’s how he would have done it. BTW, she deleted the comment within an hour of Barnes’ tweet.
“...arising out of acts undertaken in the course of their official duties.”
That’s about work screw-ups; I suspect personal time activities and personal social media account activities are not protected.
Interesting to know, though, that fed employees are so protected when they f up. Sure not so for us peasants, eh?
Dear President Trump: Please change this.
By suing anyway, it will point out the hypocrisy. For example, Congress can trade on inside information, but the rest of us can’t.
It was a tweet. Congressional speech immunity doesn’t cover it.
Yeah, I suppose the definition of” while doing official stuff” can be pretty vague and ambiguous.
I think this about covers it. A very good argument can be made she could be held to account.
Putting a scarf on a turd works as well as lipstick on a pig.
_____________________________________
Apologize now!!! You’ve insulted my dogs’ turds by comparing them to this pig. Deliberate “religious” insult.
They have privilege from arrest. Not from civil suits. The only privilege they have against civil suits is for things they say on the floor of Congress. She can and will be sued, and enjoys no privilege. The woman on TV last night on Tucker was wrong. She does not have blanket immunity
____________________
True
____________
It certainly wasn't my choice.
But seriously, you ask a GREAT question! The sick, killing left should have never gotten away with that.
Possible. Hers were non-peaceful words, meant to foment non-peaceful activities by others against non-public child entities.
tagline
..... a quick trigger finger.
“They have privilege from arrest.“
Only in chamber and traveling to/from it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.