[Trumpisourlastchance]

Why are we allowing Bolton to take us to possible Armageddon against a country that does not seek to destroy us, while we are literally being destroyed here?

This is stupid.

[DoughtyOne]

Russia was violating the treaty.

Explain why we should abide by it, when Russia isn’t.

[Olog-hai]

Treaty violations are an indication of seeking to destroy us. And the onus is not on Bolton.

[rlmorel]

Do you advocate staying in a treaty when one side openly violates it?

Wouldn’t that be the antithesis of everything Trump purports to stand for?

[House Atreides]

Why are we allowing Bolton to take us to possible Armageddon against a country that does not seek to destroy us, while we are literally being destroyed here?
**************************

Ahh....China.

IMHO, that’s the unspoken reason for this action.

[Vermont Lt]

Gee, why would he do that?

Perhaps he has stock in Raytheon. Bolton has never seen a Sabre he did not want to rattle.

[Raymann]

It’s not about Russia, it’s about China who never signed a treaty and has been developing the missiles. Russia just gave us a good excuse to pull out.

[SmokingJoe]

Time to chill and have a Tactical Arms Limitation summit between Trump and Putin. If we can do that with Kim, why not Putin who has a VASTLY more powerful nuclear arsenal?
Oh wait, the Russian “collusion” sh*t can't allow that to happen. Plus heavens forbid, Trump and Putin might go and have secret talks away from the media during the summit, like they did in Helsinki. Can't have that happen can we? /s
Thanks Roseisnstein!