Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodAndCountryFirst

There will be a great additional cost if this is done, the cost of reestablishing older people in other programs so they don’t starve to death or die of exposure. Probably cheaper to just keep it. The payments are minuscule anyway.


33 posted on 02/03/2019 7:31:35 PM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: firebrand

I’m reading the full article and I’m not that opposed to the plan as described. It would raise taxes on billionaires. I used to think that was wrong. But billionaires, from both the right and the left, are now the enemies of the American people, pushing for open borders, turning all America into deep-blue California. Let them be taxed to make the senior years less dismal for the people they lay off or rob of jobs through their cheap labor express machine.


46 posted on 02/03/2019 7:39:10 PM PST by rintintin (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: firebrand

If people “planned” for retirement by planning to become a ward of the state, whose fault is that?


47 posted on 02/03/2019 7:39:33 PM PST by GodAndCountryFirst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson