The judge claimed that by quoting 'racist' statements by Mr. Shapiro and Professor Peterson, they were subjecting their opponents, two Hispanic girls (obviously not 'White' Hispanic) to '“actual psychological violence” and that their safety was at risk.' (I guess that Tempe, AZ is too warm a climate for snowflakes of any kind!)
The 'kind of' good news is that one of the directors of the debate stated that the judge over stepped his bound HOWEVER, he also slammed the young men by stating, "... it’s incredibly obvious that – regardless of how many ways you try to couch this argument in front of that judge – the bar for the other team to respond to it was going to be so low that the argumentative content that you chose, the strategy that you chose, for that judge and for his stated philosophy, was a poor choice on your part.” Kind of a 'back handed' acknowledgement on the part of the director.
BTW, one of the disqualified high school debaters is Michael Moreno, obviously a 'White' Hispanic, trying to display his 'patriarchal white supremacy'! (/sarc)
That “judge” is a cunt.
Essentially the judge’s position is “that all your arguments are invalid because you are white”. Furthermore the very act of whites defending their position is racist and was considered physically harmful to their opposition. The game is rigged in favor of the browns.
In high school debate, it is a “game”, and you win the game by convincing the judge, or judges, that you did a better job of presenting an argument than your opponent.
So it is quite true that you need to take into account the judge/judges.
And it is surprising that the director was so obvious in saying that the judge was clearly going to be biased, and they should have KNOWN that. How? Were they supposed to look at his skin color?
Idiocracy wasn’t a movie, it was a documentary.