Posted on 02/09/2019 4:21:33 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Whether feminist types like it or not, a female breast is sexually alluring to men, in a way that a male breast or nipple is not.
The average man will be very very interested in a topless woman, while very few women will have the same reaction to a topless man.
What I wrote here is politically incorrect, but I think many here would agree with me, and that’s the difference between male and female exposure.
This is stupid, and more anti-science from those who “effing love” science.
Women’s breasts are secondary sex characteristics (or whatever they called it in my biology glass). They develop at puberty. They are essentially sex organs and exist to provide nourishment to infants and attract men to spawn such infants. This is the goal of nature: reproduction.
It is quite within reason to require women to cover their breasts. I understand women in Europe go topless at the beach. If you want to have a topless beach, that is OK by me. At the beach, only. Everybody is letting it all hang out there anyway. But let’s not make it all about “discrimination”, yes we’re going to discriminate between shirtless men and shirtless women, because they are different things. Men do not have breasts.
There are already mandated areas for nude bathing at Federal Parks. Please come to NJ or Brooklyn if you wish, but be forewarned, at the nude beach I saw only fat old Russian guys.
Think again - it will be the ugly, man-hating lesbians - aka feminists - who will be the most likely to expose their breasts publicly if it’s made legal.
And any breasts worth looking at will most certainly stay under wraps.
And we shall ignore and revile them while reveling in the wonder of the God created boobies in the nubile maidens wishing to expose them in all their glory.......
Can I get an Amen?
1970’s redoux.
Might one not get tired of seeing them?
As Ron White said, “Once you’ve seen one naked woman,
you want to see the rest of them!”
Coming next: If horses, dogs and cats can expose their genitals then why can’t humans?
Exactly. Women & Men are not the same.
Male breasts are not female breasts.
Amen, except for Femen?
And shouldn’t this be a State’s issue or even a local issue. I don’t think this should be settled for the whole Nation like gay marriage from DC.
Forgive me my son (?). I forgot the /s
(If Men Can Expose Their Breasts, Why Can’t Women?)
For the same reason a person in a public swimming pool can pee in the water, but he CAN’T stand at the edge of the pool and pee in the water.
Dumb question.
Congress First ,LOL
Tits on a man are as “useless as tits on a boar hog”.
Anyone remember that old saying?
State's rights.
We lost those in the War Between the States. The powers that be want us to believe that war was about slavery.
It was all about states rights - and we lost them.
Yeah, me neither
Women who bare their breasts will be the first to complain that men are looking.
If you can’t figure it out, you’re a lot dumber than you look. Either that or Mommy and Daddy never explained the birds and the bees to you. What do you want to do? Trigger the beloved Muzzie “americans”?
Because men and women are different. This is what they are really trying to destroy. It has nothing to do with rights. It has everything to do with trying to make women men and men women.
They can legalize anything they want, only skanks will disrobe. Virtuous women will continue to dress modestly.
“In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works” (I Timothy 2:9-10 KJV).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.