None of those mentioned by McCabe was a member of Congress or. a cabinet secretary. Yet the proposed to wire the DAG to get evidence on the POTUS and to solicit cabinet members. This was not talking about it over a beer. They had a goal and a plan to achieve it. And if they had a scintilla of evidence, where has it been these last two years? No, this was a coup in the making.
PDJT was daily speaking extemporaneously on a wide range of issues and making many, many good decisions. There has been zero, zilch, nada discussion of any doctor that had examined him and found his capabilities lacking.
The occasion that brought this to the fore was admitted to be Comey's firing. Comey had it coming, of course. Lying to Congress and leaking classified information can get you fired for cause any day of the week. But Trump didn't need for cause to exist to fire Comey. He could have legally done it with no cause whatsoever.
So with Comey's firing as a backdrop that reportedly angered them, and about which Comey hasn't ceased throwing all manner of verbal trash toward PDJT, it's clear these discussion were retribution that they clearly imagined they could have an active role in bringing about. (It's a coup.)
In light of the participation in the FISA warrant, known to be bogus and paid for by DNC and Hillary (but I repeat myself), and money to procure such was clandestinely laundered through Fusion GPS and Perkins Coie to a spy, a foreign national, who vociferously exhibited extreme political animus against Trump, there is no other interpretation than coup.
As Tucker said, you can't have recorded discussions with a round-table of hitmen about killing your wife, then think you're out of the woods on any criminality because killer hasn't yet successfully pulled the trigger, even while multiple of the hitmen have already testified against you. (Ok, Tucker didn't quite say all that verbatim, but that was the gist.)