Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coronal

This is crap.

A lifetime appointment should be truncated to a maximum age. Maybe the Federal retirement age.

If someone wants to run for office past that, fine. Their choice. But this is an Octogenarian stubbornly refusing to admit she can’t possibly do her job.

It’s not an entitlement and she’s not royalty.


15 posted on 02/15/2019 7:56:10 AM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Regulator
It’s not an entitlement and she’s not royalty.

Says a card carrying member of the Great Unwashed who has forgotten his place in the Peoples Republic of the United States.

27 posted on 02/15/2019 8:08:25 AM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60's....You weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Regulator

A lifetime appointment should be truncated to a maximum age.


That wold require a Constitutional Amendment, highly unlikely IMHO. FDR tried an end-around by trying to pass a bill through Congress that would allow him to appoint Justices to “help” aging Justices with their workload (of course it was to counter the anti-New Deal votes in SCOTUS). Even Dems thought this a bridge too far and rejected it. Today’s Dems won’t hesitate if they gain control of the Presidency and the Senate.


52 posted on 02/15/2019 8:52:13 AM PST by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson