Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Student charged with wiretapping after livestreaming meeting at Maryland Rep. Harris' office
The Baltimore Sun ^ | February 14, 2019 | Lillian Reed and Jeff Barker

Posted on 02/15/2019 7:43:51 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Fungi

Do we still have the Bill of Rights?

I think it is past due and there hasn’t been a payment made in years.


21 posted on 02/16/2019 5:59:41 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
When another member of Harris’s staff noticed several people on their phones, the group was told they were not allowed to record because of an office policy,

So, it's not even illegal, it's against office policy? What a load of bullshit...
22 posted on 02/16/2019 6:18:21 AM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

Thank you for your reply. If you recall where and when you saw the article and would let me know, it would be much appreciated. I’d really like to know the specifics.


23 posted on 02/16/2019 3:16:38 PM PST by Postman (The flies seek our domestic enemies.....but ain't no flies on DJT....MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Postman

It is a Project Veritas case.

Project Veritas Action Fund
Plantiff
v.
Daniel F Conley
Suffolk County Dist Atty

Massachusetts Law Prohibiting Secret Recording of Public Officials Deemed Unconstitutional

US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Rules in Veritas’ Favor

“[T]he Court holds that [Massachusetts law] may not constitutionally prohibit the secret audio recording of government officials…”


24 posted on 02/17/2019 12:30:40 AM PST by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

https://www.projectveritas.com/2018/12/10/veritas-suit-makes-first-amendment-history-changes-ma-recording-law/

Filed on December 10, 2018, the United States District Court District of Massachusetts found, “the First Amendment protects the right to record audio and video of government officials,” deeming the law prohibiting secret recordings of government officials unconstitutional.

The unconstitutional law, enforceable in Massachusetts since 1968, allowed for a felony conviction for up to five years in prison, and a $10,000 for the secret recording of a public official.

Audio Recording is More Powerful Than Ordinary Reporting

The Court explained in the judgement that “audio and audiovisual recording are uniquely reliable and powerful methods of preserving and disseminating news and information about events that occur in public. Their self-authenticating character makes it highly unlikely that other methods could be considered reasonably adequate substitutes.”

The Court agreed in the judgment that secretly recording government officials is a “basic, vital, and well-established liberty safeguarded by the First Amendment.”


25 posted on 02/17/2019 8:13:56 PM PST by daniel1212 (Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

So...what about this other case then? And thanks for the post the summed it up very well.


26 posted on 02/18/2019 1:31:42 AM PST by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom
So...what about this other case then? And thanks for the post the summed it up very well.

Nothing in principle, but FR not simply meant to not inform but it is a forum, a place for an exchange of ideas and commenting and even debate thereof, and having to watch a video on a debatable issue - esp. one that is over an hour long - before being able to weigh in the merits of it militates against it. The author of such should be able to provide his main points in readable form.

The exceptions are when a vid is posted for entertainment or simply education vs. something quite debatable.

27 posted on 02/18/2019 3:39:11 PM PST by daniel1212 (Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

Sorry for the delay. Thanks for the information. I don’t know what to say about it. I am sure the definitive resolution will eventually be at the USSC level. Stay well.


28 posted on 02/24/2019 7:25:55 PM PST by Postman (The flies seek our domestic enemies.....but ain't no flies on DJT....MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson