Read more at...
Can we stop using that term? I know it's often meant ironically, but there are at least three things wrong with it.
First, it's a euphemism made up by the Left to sugar-coat their fascism. It's just a palatable phrase that's designed to hide the intolerance and tyranny behind the racism, class envy, and violence that are hallmarks of leftist totalitarianism.
Second, it's a lie. There's nothing "just" about the demands that white male God-fearing America deny its successes and wallow in its failures. There's nothing "just" about stealing money from people who've earned it, to hand out to people who haven't. There's nothing "just" about discriminating against people on the basis of their skin color, as long as it's white. There's no "justice" in these people, only hate. But "hate tyrants" wouldn't sell very well to the public.
Third, the movement isn't even social. It's limited to a handful of malcontents who are in fact ANTI-social. At heart, they're anarchists, and you don't get much more anti-social than that.
About the only thing they got right was the "warrior" part, in the sense that these people are always at war with somebody over something.
So let's stop giving them the high ground. Find a more accurate term for the oppressive, intolerant, self-righteous, pretentious, narrow-minded, bigoted marxists.
I modestly propose:
.
“Hysterical Psychotic Whiners”
.
That should work fine.
Well said. Leftist euphemisms are typically the opposite of what they represent: Orwell on Parade.
It is for that reason I refuse to use
Politically Correct (Culturally Marxist) terms, since that yields precious philosophical territory to the enemy. To wit:
There is no such thing as homosexuality (i.e., a functional form of human reproduction between two persons of the same binary sex), and such are frequently not gay temperamentally. It is homoeroticism: the narcissistic fetishization of another person of the same binary sex.
To even use those terms grants their unnatural behavior a legitimacy it does not merit.