Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Four names emerge for UN position: report
The Hill ^ | Feb 18, 2019 | Miranda Green

Posted on 02/18/2019 7:08:04 PM PST by CondoleezzaProtege

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: entropy12

You’re not getting around the only reason he’s even being considered as such is his skin color. Millions of Americans with better qualifications.

And the UN ambassador doesn’t really have much of anything to do with deciding to go to war. Certainly didn’t re: Iraq.


41 posted on 02/19/2019 9:46:46 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

He’s got that WP degree and served his time. He runs and grew a family business. He doesn’t look at all compromised or in line to get favors. He’s very impressive. I’m glad he’s on our side, not theirs.


42 posted on 02/19/2019 9:56:54 AM PST by grania ("We're all just pawns in their game")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

I did not imply UN ambassador made the decision to invade Iraq. I was pointing to the foreign policy blunders made by “experienced” foreign policy experts.

Main problem in my opinion is people like George Bush and his advisers are not familiar with the mindset of radical Islam in middle-east.

And yes, the best approach to break the stranglehold democrats currently have on African-American voters (95%) is to show republicans have no problem promoting African_Americans. If republicans can snatch 15% of blacks away from democrats in major elections, it will be seismic change.


43 posted on 02/19/2019 10:17:16 AM PST by entropy12 (Legal immigrants under chain migration not any better than illegal immigrants! Merit ONLY!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Academics....great point.

Isn’t interesting when you see some of the people that are touted out as advisers for this and that. Especially things like, National Security Adviser and a few other sensitive posts like that.

Fox has that redhead, good looking, that was apparently a National Security Adviser to someone, somewhere. Don’t know her name. I know nothing about her, her background, her education and she might be as sharp as they come and has been on the right side of everything since the day she walked thru the door. And I’m not trying to be a chauvinist, but........when I think of a National Security Adviser, I want Jack Bauer, Cofer Black(real CIA guy, BTW), Jason Bourne, Chesty Puller, Patton. I don’t want some Ivy League, over-educated person that doesn’t know which end of the gun the bullet comes out of. I know that there’s more to it, but it’d be nice to have someone in those positions that knows the difference between an M1 Abrams and a HumVee.

Look at Ben Rhodes...no experience in anything and there he is, advising obama on national security issues. He was a f*cking speechwriter.

Rhodes then spent five years as an assistant to Hamilton, helping to draft the Iraq Study Group Report and the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission.

In 2007, Rhodes began working as a speechwriter for the 2008 Obama presidential campaign.

Rhodes wrote Obama’s 2009 Cairo speech “A New Beginning”. Rhodes was the adviser who counseled Obama to withdraw support from Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak, becoming a key adviser during the 2011 Arab Spring.

Boy, that Arab Spring thing sure did turn out ok, didn’t it? Good Lord!!!!!!


44 posted on 02/19/2019 10:47:53 AM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: grania

We as a country and as a party need to learn to stop desperately pushing African-Americans ahead to where they are beyond their preparation and likely to fail.

Far better to bring him along reasonably. He probably could have won a House seat and needs something of the equivalent of that in Trump’s admin.

That is not the UN ambassadorship for a guy with so little of that kind of public international and PR experience. It just isn’t. My guess is he’s in there as a floated name only, but I think giving him that position now would not be doing him any favors.


45 posted on 02/19/2019 12:13:09 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

The problem with Bush and his team was much deeper than that.

But no, Trump didn’t win the level of support he has now from AAs, which is higher than a Republican has had in decades, by pandering. That’s not what we need.


46 posted on 02/19/2019 12:14:23 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

It would be far better than Nikki Haley when she was there. You put in someone established, and who know’s what deep pockets already own them.


47 posted on 02/19/2019 12:20:31 PM PST by grania ("We're all just pawns in their game")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: grania

Haley is anti-Trump, of course—despite her playing nice to get the added credential.

But again, you’re presenting a false dichotomy.

Also, isn’t he planning to run for the other Senate seat in MI in 2020? The primary is just 12 months out.


48 posted on 02/19/2019 12:23:54 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson