Posted on 02/21/2019 8:20:21 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Tax time is usually an unhappy time for taxpayers, but a joyous time for government employees and the welfare class that gets more in “refunds” than it ever pays in taxes.
But this year, tax time is a depressing time for the taxmasters in the big blue states.
Blue states use high taxes to finance their frivolous spending. But this year, the money just isn’t there even as House and Senate lefties from big blue states tout new plans to soak the rich.
Senator Elizabeth Warren made headlines by building her 2020 campaign around a “wealth tax”.
Warren called it, “the 'Ultra-Millionaire Tax” and claimed that it only “applies to that tippy top 0.1% – those with a net worth of over $50 million”. That’s convenient because the millionaire class warrior’s own estimated net worth tops out at around $10 million. When millionaires like Elizabeth Warren talk about taxing wealth, they mean the wealth of the millionaires who are wealthier than they are.
But over in Warren’s Taxachusetts, soaking the rich isn’t keeping the blue state model afloat.
Massachusetts experienced a January tax revenue shortfall of $195 million. That’s down 6% from 2018. And January is the cold, snowy month that is meant to account for 10% of the revenues for the year.
December was none too cheerful either.
"While most major categories of revenue continue to perform generally as expected, Massachusetts, like a number of other states, experienced below-benchmark performance in the category of non-withheld income in both December and January, particularly in individual estimated payments," the head of the Department of Revenue announced.
“As serious as a heart attack," New York’s Governor Cuomo was much less restrained when discussing New York’s $2.3 billion plus revenue shortfall.
“This is the most serious revenue shock the state has faced in many years," State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli warned.
“Tax the rich. Tax the rich. Tax the rich. We did that. God forbid the rich leave," Cuomo groused, noting that the 1% of wealthy tax filers also pay almost half the state's income taxes. But, after tax reform, many of the rich were fleeing. Florida, with no income tax, was a commonplace destination.
New York lost almost 50,000 people last year. Florida gained over 300,000 people.
“I want to personally welcome anyone escaping high tax states to join the hundreds of thousands of their former neighbors who have already moved to Florida,” Governor Rick Scott announced last year.
“For richer people, your tax liability could have gone up now $100-, $200-, $300,000,” Governor Cuomo whined. “And there is a tipping point where people say, ‘I love New York, but to spend another $300,000 in taxes? I’ll move.’”
In the Occupy Wall Street era, Mayor Bloomberg had warned about the danger of tax hikes. “One percent of the households that file in this city pay something like 50% of the taxes. In the city, that's something like 40,000 people. If a handful left, any raise would make it revenue neutral."
His successor, Mayor Bill de Blasio, is a lazy Marxist and clueless about economics. “Brothers and sisters, there’s plenty of money in the world," he declared in his State of the City address. "There’s plenty of money in this city. It’s just in the wrong hands.”
The ‘wrong hands’ being any hands other than his pudgy manicured fingertips.
These days he’s singing a different tune.
In February, a doleful De Blasio declared that the city expects to see $935 million less in income tax revenue. That 7% drop is going to make New York City’s $92 billion budget, up $3 billion since last year, a lot more challenging. And, for the first time ever, he demanded that city agencies cut three-quarters of a billion, even as he doubled down on welfare to polish his progressive image for a presidential run.
“We have some tough choices up ahead,” he warned.
Sorry, “brothers and sisters”, suddenly there wasn’t “plenty of money in the city” anymore.
Is Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who made headlines with a 70% tax rate, paying attention to her own backyard? And by that, I don’t mean New York City. The fake “Girl from the Bronx” is actually from one of the wealthiest suburbs in the country with the highest property taxes in the country. Westchester took a downgrade from its AAA rating back in the fall. Another downgrade may hit it within two years.
Home prices are falling as tax reform is hammering Westchester’s deeply flawed economic strategy. And the flawed blue state economic strategy of tax happy enclaves around the country.
New Jersey’s Department of the Treasury noted a 35% tax revenue fall. California State Controller Betty Yee reported a $2.5 billion revenue shortfall. Tax reform is in the wind. And it’s blowing away the blues.
The blue state model hollowed out the greatest cities in America by making them unlivable for the middle class. High taxes in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco and countless other cities have turned them into enclaves in which you either need to be rich or on welfare to be able to live in them. And that has made the blue state model precariously dependent on a small and very wealthy tax base.
Lefty politicians solve everything by spending more money and raising taxes on the wealthy. Tax reform made that an unsustainable strategy because, suddenly, red state taxpayers weren’t covering blue state tax bills. And that revealed just how hollow and vulnerable the blue state economic model really is.
When you don’t have a middle class, then the tax burden falls on a very small and mobile population. Unlike the middle class, which is tethered more tightly to jobs and single homes, the sorts of people that progressives are obsessed with taxing are a less stable tax base because they are fewer and freer.
The flip side of class warfare is that your targets can fight back by leaving and leaving you with nothing.
Senator Elizabeth Warren and other blue staters want to take the same failed model nationwide. Their fantasies of a massive national tax hike try to escape the limitations of tax reform by imposing taxes that no one can escape by moving to Florida. Lefties love telling us that we should learn from Europe.
It’s a pity that they never do.
France tried out a tax on the ‘super-rich’. And they packed up and left. The failed state which has the highest tax rates in the modern world is losing its tax base. 10,000 millionaires left France in 2015. 6% of Parisian millionaires got out. 12,000 millionaires left in 2016. Many moved to the US and to the UK.
Socialists, as Britain’s Margaret Thatcher had observed, “always run out of other people’s money.”
Senator Elizabeth Warren and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez want to take the same high taxes that devastated Massachusetts and New York nationwide. The blue state model wrecked blue states.
Now the wreckers of Massachusetts and New York want to wreck America.
The “Ultra-Millionaire” tax only applies to the tippy-top tax bracket..... until it doesn’t.
Job one will be to get the tax up and running. Then, it can be ‘adjusted’ quickly to the needs of the socialists.
Most people making $30k or less can hardly imagine that in the near future, they, too, will be labeled the ‘Greedy Rich’.
Taxing the rich is just a gift to politicians for extortion. Leona Helmsley, anyone?
Repeat after me,”Its all about POWER...POWER...POWER!!!!”
LOL - that's a keeper...
That's how they sold the Income Tax in the first place.
1-Who, other than some celebrities and pro-athletes, "earns" more than $50 million/year? This type of legislation is targeted at some very specific people.
2-New York City has a $92 billion budget? 5 boroughs has that much in tax payer funded services? WOW. Just, WOW!
I have two words for the NY taxers...”Art Laffer”.
An old saying was that the socialist would solve everything if he could take half the wealth from the rich and divide it equally among the poor. Then what if they run out of money? Then take half of what the rich have left and divide that again. Ad infinitum.
American cities are already working on that but with higher tax percentages than 50%.
Art Laffer....
////////////////////
You threw us all a curve with that.
I really think this taxing the rich thing could work with more effort. Of course, they’d have to build a wall around each state to keep the rich from escaping and they’d have to confiscate their airplanes...
In 1913, if you filed using the first income tax form, you paid nothing unless you made $20,000 per year. This inflation calculator says that $20,000 in 1913 is equivalent to $508,509.09 today. The top rate was 6%, and didn't kick in until $500,000, which is $12,712,727.27 today.
Try filling out the 1913 form using your current numbers. You'll probably be surprised how well you do, even using inflated money.
Duh! That’s why they want control of the Federal Government.
So you can’t run away.
Back three years ago, someone did reporting and saying that NY City had 8,600 millionaires (misleading). In terms of pulling in $50 million a year...my guess is that we are talking about less than 200. Half are probably non-Americans (Russians, Brits, etc).
The Yankees had Alex Rodriguez back a decade ago, who was desperately trying to limit his days in NYC and claiming only 150 days of the year of living in the city (in some upscale apartment). But I doubt if he was making more than $20-million a year.
Read carefully. Its not $50 million per year income, its a wealth tax on anyone that is worth $50 million or more.
Good catch. I was in the mindset of AOC who wanted to tax income, not net worth.
A specific tax on the rich is unconstitutional. But when has that ever stopped a liberal or a socialist?
all a part of Trump’s plan.
Ocasio Cortez:
The hammer in that bag reminds me. I have a hammer that has lasted twenty years. I replace the head or the handle once in a while, though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.