“Numerous studies of low birth weight babies show that these kids tend to do very poorly as they grow up.IIRC academic achievement tends to be poor as do various behavior parameters.I believe it’s thought that problems with brain development,in utero as well as after birth,are the main cause.”
SO? “IT” should just be “killed”! Not “worth” all the trouble?
Maybe we should test all kids at, let’s say 5 years old?, and “kill” all the ones whose “achievement tends to be poor or show sub standard various behavior parameters”? /s
Life begins at conception, not deniable, a proved scientific FACT!
Taking of an innocent life is MURDER! Not to mention a “SIN”.
It’s the inevitable result of materialist technocracy. The prime example of which was eugenics. A pseudoscientific theory falsely considered “settled science” that led to the slaughters of millions. And still does today though they use other words besides eugenics. Like “choice”. Or especially “studies” like the one you responded to. Pseudoscientific statistical number crunching. The Professions are full of it.
Nope...never said that..never suggested that.The *only* thing I was suggesting was that this child may very well have a difficult life.
No, I dont think that this is what is being said.
I would not intervene in such a pregnancy, but instead let nature take its course.