Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lamar Alexander to Trump: Reconsider emergency declaration or risk GOP rebellion
New York Post ^ | 2/28/2019 | Bob Fredericks

Posted on 03/01/2019 10:30:23 AM PST by Menehune56

Tennessee GOP Sen. Lamar Alexander told President Trump on Thursday that he should reconsider his decision to declare a national emergency at the southern border or face a possible Republican rebellion. Alexander, who is retiring, refused to say whether he would join three other Republicans — Susan Collins of Maine, Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska — in voting against the declaration.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Alaska; US: Maine; US: North Carolina; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: alaska; buildthefence; daca; dreamact; dreamers; lamaralexander; lisamurkowski; maine; northcarolina; susancollins; tennessee; thomtillis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: ScottfromNJ

Trump will never be reelected fighting both parties. The GOP is goading him here. Big time. They desperately want him to lose.


21 posted on 03/01/2019 10:43:11 AM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: All

Unless he has changed his mind I think Lamar is retiring and won’t run again.


22 posted on 03/01/2019 10:44:26 AM PST by Tennessee Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56
the new administration isn't permitted by the Supreme Court to end DACA.

Not so - the Court merely declined to hear the adminisration's 9th Circuit-skipping appeal.

Four courts have stated that President Trump has the authority to end DACA as a policy decision ... the ball's in his court.

Regents of the University of California v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security : "To be clear: we do not hold that DACA could not be rescinded as an exercise of Executive Branch discretion. We hold only that here, where the Executive did not make a discretionary choice to end DACA—but rather acted based on an erroneous view of what the law required—the rescission was arbitrary and capricious under settled law. The government is, as always, free to reexamine its policy choices"

Napolitano v DHS: "All agree that a new administration is entitled to replace old policies with new policies [...] the new administration didn’t terminate DACA on policy grounds. It terminated DACA over a point of law, a pithy conclusion that the agency had exceeded its statutory and constitutional authority."

Batalla Vidal v. Nielsen: "Defendants indisputably can end the DACA program. [...] The question before the court is thus not whether Defendants could end the DACA program, but whether they offered legally adequate reasons for doing so. Based on its review of the record before it, the court concludes that Defendants have not done so. First, the decision to end the DACA program appears to rest exclusively on a legal conclusion that the program was unconstitutional and violated the APA and INA."

NAACP v. Trump: "while immigration policies are generally “so exclusively entrusted to the political branches of government as to be largely immune from judicial inquiry or interference,” there are good reasons to scrutinize a policy more carefully when it is based solely on an agency’s reading of domestic statutory law."

23 posted on 03/01/2019 10:45:28 AM PST by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

Is this the bag of bones that I last saw holding up a flannel shirt? Back in the ‘80’s?


24 posted on 03/01/2019 10:46:45 AM PST by VietVet876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Both parties do not realize just how fed up w/ illegal immigration the voting public is. This is the clear case of donrs having sway with politicians who no longer represent the people but rather represent themselves and their continued political power to tell people what to think and believe.


25 posted on 03/01/2019 10:46:48 AM PST by Jimmy The Snake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

Mr Lamar, reconsider spending all your efforts getting along with Democrats rather than keeping things like campaign promises or you may continue to experience the angst of Republicsn voters as you did last year.


26 posted on 03/01/2019 10:47:05 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

Shaddup, Lamer. Resign already.


27 posted on 03/01/2019 10:47:37 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj ("It's Slappin' Time !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

Yes:

“Sen. Lamar Alexander will not run for re-election in 2020, he announced Monday.

The 78-year-old Tennessee Republican will serve out the rest of his current term. In a statement, Alexander said, “it is time for someone else to have that privilege” of representing the state in the Senate.”

Just like his former “buddy,” Jeff (the) Flake!


28 posted on 03/01/2019 10:47:43 AM PST by vette6387 (Fire Mueller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Made In The USA

They’ve invaded Tennessee, too. He doesn’t care.


29 posted on 03/01/2019 10:48:12 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj ("It's Slappin' Time !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

Alexander is not running in 2020. He just there to cause trouble like his old friend Corker was. Lamar will be rememered he went against a very popular president in his home state


30 posted on 03/01/2019 10:48:34 AM PST by Sybeck1 (Trump 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Conservative; All

Feel free to post the mem/gif of the guy from Tombstone saying:

WELL BYE !


31 posted on 03/01/2019 10:50:10 AM PST by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

Lamar, take a walk and get lost. You are a real piece of trash.


32 posted on 03/01/2019 10:50:56 AM PST by mulligan (EeThe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

Somebody should check the Swiss bank accounts of Lamar! and the other GOP wafflers for evidence of cartel payoffs. Their position cannot be based on any logical assessment of the current situation.


33 posted on 03/01/2019 10:51:08 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

Lamar Alexandria will not be missed.


34 posted on 03/01/2019 10:51:23 AM PST by Kickaha (See the glory...of the royal scam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

Sounds like you East TN folks need to take out the trash. Git on’r.


35 posted on 03/01/2019 10:52:54 AM PST by fuente (Liberty resides in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box and the cartridge box--Fredrick Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56
Well, surprise, surprise, surprise... never saw that comin’! Yeah, right...

Lamar Alexander, along with Susan Collins of Maine, Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, are doing what they are paid to do by those who own them and direct their actions as Senators.

🤔Hmmmm...I wonder who those owners are ... 🤷‍♂️... because I don’t believe “they” are the people who voted those Senators into office.

36 posted on 03/01/2019 10:53:17 AM PST by GBA (Your beliefs => Your reality - Reset and recalibrate to the Source 1x/day min.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

I notice after reading the article that he doesn’t provide any reason, rationale or substance to his opposition.


37 posted on 03/01/2019 10:55:01 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Lamar Alexander was a part of the Tennessee cabal that was the most miserable Republican representation in any state this side of Arizona.


38 posted on 03/01/2019 10:58:08 AM PST by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

He does not care.


39 posted on 03/01/2019 11:00:18 AM PST by eclectic (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

Source of Funds (Campaign Committee), 2013 - 2018

Type Amount Percentage
Small Individual Contributions (< $200) $125,371 1.56%
Large Individual Contributions $4,663,499 58.07%
PAC Contributions* $3,066,260 38.18%
Candidate self-financing $5,200 0.06%
Other $171,101 2.13%

[SOURCE: opensecrets.org ]

He should spare us his phony conservatism & constitutionalism BS. The Deep Pockets crowd that owns him are among the select few who don't suffer - but benefit - from Open Borders globalism.


40 posted on 03/01/2019 11:01:03 AM PST by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson