Let’s wrap this Freepathon up, Folks!
Posted on 03/06/2019 2:04:05 PM PST by jazusamo
The Washington Post's fact-checker sharply critiqued former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for her claims on Sunday concerning voter suppression in Wisconsin and Georgia in the 2016 presidential election.
“Clinton made several factual errors, offered questionable claims about a couple of studies, and ended up giving a misleading assessment of her loss,” Salvador Rizzo wrote in his column. The Post gave Clinton “Four Pinocchios.”
“I was the first person who ran for president without the protection of the Voting Rights Act, and I will tell you, it makes a really big difference,” Clinton said Sunday in Selma, Ala., commemorating “Bloody Sunday.” “And it doesn’t just make a difference in Alabama and Georgia; it made a difference in Wisconsin,...
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
She is a serial liar and a sociopath.....................
The ONLY reason to object to mandatory Voter ID is to PROMOTE VOTE FRAUD.
Right on, on both counts!
+1
She will go to her death whining and sobbing about how she was “screwed”. I hope she experiences eternal suffering for her many and ongoing crimes. Traitorous wretch.
I can’t believe the Bezos Post gave her FOUR Pinochios.
Wisconsin was not covered under the section of the VRA that was terminated by the Supreme Court ruling, so that ruling could not have any effect on them.
> “Clinton made several factual errors, offered questionable claims about a couple of studies, and ended up giving a misleading assessment of her loss,” Salvador Rizzo wrote in his column. <
Hey, Sal. Don’t be taking any long walks in the park anytime soon. Accidents can happen, dontcha know?
Yep, that’s hilarious!
Wow. They gave her four Pinnochios
Let’s wrap this Freepathon up, Folks!
The interesting thing is that it’s the Post. What happened?
The Democrat Party obviously wants to brush her aside, other wise they would have spun her lies into differences of opinion or some other “nuanced” B.S.
you missed spelled oh nevermind
Still LMAO as pathetic as it is.
So the Voting Rights Act was meant to protect her? Typical Hillary-all about her.
She immediately used Wisconsin as an example. The only problem was never under jurisdiction of Voting Rights Act
smh
Killary isn’t the only person who ran in that race. If she wasn’t covered by the voting rights act, nobody else was, either. And, she syill lost, thank God.
more lies, more poor me, more hysteria, more scapegoating, unable to accept reality, neurotic, delusional
well at least she was finally screwed
Poor Hillary.....
snip
Richard H. Pildes, a professor of constitutional law at New York University,
told Salon by email that the Shelby County decision “played no role at all
in the devastating losses Hillary Clinton suffered in industrial or Rust
Belt states like Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio [and] Pennsylvania, or her ability
to squeak out only a narrow victory in Minnesota.” Beyond two counties in
Michigan that were irrelevant to the election result, Pildes said, “None
of those states were covered ... by the part of the VRA the court struck down.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.