Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gaijin
If we hadn’t had an America-hating Prez for 8 years, what we’re today seeing might have happened years ago.

I'm not so sure about that.

In any event, spaceflight has to be taken out of the political sphere. Otherwise, you get what you see: NASA being used as a platform for all kinds of virtue-signaling and political agendas that have nothing to do with its original mission.

The private sector can take over now. This is the normal model. Government paid for the R&D for the first wide body jet (the C5-A), including for the TF39 high-bypass engine that powered it.

The technology then was transitioned to the private sector. The Boeing 747, Lockheed L-1011, and DC-10 followed, and the noisy TF39 was modified and improved to become the CF6 engine, from which modern high-bypass engine technology was derived. NASA has no large-scale mission at present. To continue to get its budget, it has to prostitute itself out to politicians.

10 posted on 03/08/2019 6:57:45 AM PST by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Steely Tom

Considering that the 747 first flew just a few months after the C5, don’t think you can really say that the 747 came from the C5.

And if I remember correctly, the AF liked Boeing’s bid better, but Lockheed was cheaper.


15 posted on 03/08/2019 7:28:42 AM PST by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson