To: budj
The "offensive" statement form Pirro:
“Think about it. Omar wears a hijab, which according to the Quran 33:59, tells women to cover so they won’t get molested. Is her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to Sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution?”
2 posted on
03/12/2019 6:52:58 AM PDT by
budj
(combat vet, 2nd of 3 generations)
To: budj
Should be in more of a question as in , “Compare and Contrast the Quran and the Constitution....”
Pretty self explanatory there, if you ask me.
8 posted on
03/12/2019 6:56:06 AM PDT by
griswold3
(Just another unlicensed nonconformist in a dangerous Liberal world.)
To: budj
Did Pirro also mention that Congress has a prohibition against its members wearing religious garb on the floor?
16 posted on
03/12/2019 7:08:43 AM PDT by
odawg
To: budj
The "offensive" statement form Pirro: “Think about it. Omar wears a hijab, which according to the Quran 33:59, tells women to cover so they won’t get molested. Is her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to Sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution?” Sheesh, what's all the hubbub - that's a great statement.
19 posted on
03/12/2019 7:17:46 AM PDT by
1Old Pro
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson