FULL TITLE:
Hillary Clinton investigators were told Obama DOJ 'not willing to charge' her on key espionage statute: internal chart
To: Red Badger
Let’s face it.
Would you want to charge Hillary! with anything?
I swear, that woman has a ninja clan going around offing people who threaten her in any way.
2 posted on
03/14/2019 9:06:12 AM PDT by
Little Ray
(Freedom Before Security!)
To: Red Badger
So a criminal was set free because she has money and influence.
3 posted on
03/14/2019 9:08:03 AM PDT by
I want the USA back
(Lying Media: willing and eager allies of the hate-America left.)
To: Red Badger
We may need to add those who prosecute the Clintonistas to the list of those eligible for the Witness Protection Program.
4 posted on
03/14/2019 9:09:54 AM PDT by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: Red Badger
So they are hoping to destroy what is left of Paul Manafort’s life for helping Donald Trump’s campaign, but they want Hillary and Bill to walk free after all the despicable traitorous and murderous things that they have done. I pray for justice, and that would be those two to get about 20 life terms a piece for their crimes. Let the Clinton’s spend the rest of their lives behind bars including Webster Hubbell’s progeny, Chelsea.
5 posted on
03/14/2019 9:10:00 AM PDT by
fireman15
To: Red Badger
Laws are only for the chumps. Not them.
To: Red Badger
10 posted on
03/14/2019 9:14:30 AM PDT by
EnglishOnly
(eWFight all out to win OR get out now. .)
To: Red Badger
Hillary stole a lot of FBI files on a lot of people. Of course she wasn’t charged for this either. She has too much dirt on the corrupt politicians.
12 posted on
03/14/2019 9:18:02 AM PDT by
IC Ken
(Stop making stupid people famous)
To: Red Badger
Just how many of these people are going after Trump now?
To: Red Badger
More like....Hillary told the investigators....”Don’t even think it.”.
To: Red Badger
So, Obama was colluding with Hillary?
17 posted on
03/14/2019 9:23:16 AM PDT by
Slyfox
(Not my circus, not my monkeys)
To: Red Badger
They fought so hard on the negligence charge because it would have been the easiest to prove.
She was clearly negligent.
If found guilty of negligence, she would have received a fairly mild sentence.
The problem was, that in gathering the evidence for the negligence case, Hillarys awful criminal actions would have been exposed.
The Democrats have spent a lot of money and sacrificed a lot of pawns to protect their criminal Queen.
19 posted on
03/14/2019 9:26:21 AM PDT by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: Red Badger
Even if they do charge her for “mishandling”... that would itself be a cover-up if it doesn’t address the actual content of her communications.
She should be charged for selling her office. Anything less is a cover-up. Its like getting Capone for not having a concealed-carry permit.
25 posted on
03/14/2019 9:46:05 AM PDT by
marron
To: Red Badger
No wonder Lynch recused herself. She did so as to let unworthy underlings take the future heat.
Prosecute Hitlery now, we have the evidence on her.
26 posted on
03/14/2019 9:52:09 AM PDT by
Candor7
((Obama Fascism)http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
To: Red Badger
Now we know what the conversation Bubba had w Lynch on the airplane sitting in the tarmac.
To: Red Badger
So If you put all the pieces together here's what you get...
The DNC rigs the Democratic Primary Election against Bernie Sanders so Hillary could win the nomination. Obama’s administration starts to request surveillance on Trump, his family, his transition team, and anyone associated with him. Donna Brazil gives Hillary the questions to a debate.
The DNC ( Hillary) pays Christopher Steele to come up with a smear dossier about Trump. The mainstream media releases a taped conversation about Trump talking about grabbing women parts. After all this Trump still wins the General Election. Obama orders an investigation into Russia meddling in our elections. Obama changes Executive Order 12333 to allow more agencies to have access to surveillance data.
The Democratic Party comes up with a scandal that Trump Colluded with Russia to win the election with no evidence or proof.
This wild claim is backed up by the mainstream media. Obama hold overs start unmasking Trump's transition team and staff members then release the classified information to the mainstream media. Why? Because the DNC and the Obama administration Colluded with the intelligence community to thwart Trump's campaign efforts to get him elected president. All this Russia collusion is an attempt to cover up the fact that the Obama administration, the intelligence community, the DNC, along with the mainstream media used our nations surveillance as a political tool to try to get Hillary elected President.
This makes Watergate look like a kindergarten play. Let that sink in
To: All
Was this a political decision on behalf of the party or with all the mysterious deaths around thr Clintons was it a fear of early end if life?
32 posted on
03/14/2019 10:17:09 AM PDT by
Retvet
(Retvet)
To: Red Badger
So this is a deliberate, and real, obstruction of justice - and we know whom was responsible.
Anyone that says “Trump obstruction” needs to be responded to with “Hillary DOJ obstruction with evidence”.
37 posted on
03/14/2019 11:40:08 AM PDT by
fuzzylogic
(welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
To: Red Badger
Because 0bama was involved in it up to his eyeballs! 0bama obstructed. This needs to be prosecuted.
39 posted on
03/14/2019 12:13:04 PM PDT by
FrdmLvr
(They never thought she would lose.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson