Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Strzok: Defended Affair, Said Mueller Never Questioned Him On Bias and Revealed A DOJ Deal With FBI
saraacarter.com ^ | 3/14/2019 | Sara A. Carter

Posted on 03/15/2019 7:51:52 AM PDT by bitt

Former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok said he would have never been compromised by foreign adversaries or other nefarious actors, despite his long time affair with his paramour former FBI lawyer Lisa Page, according to testimony released Thursday.

Strzok also revealed details about his removal from Robert Mueller’s Special Counsel’s investigation, the removal of his security clearance and answered a slew of questions regarding the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server to send classified documents. The lawmakers also asked detailed questions about his role overseeing the FBI’s investigation into President Trump’s campaign and alleged Russian collusion.

As head of the FBI’s Russia division in counterintelligence, Strzok was fired last year by the FBI, after a lengthy investigation by the Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz revealed details about Strzok’s affair and exposed tens of thousands of anti-Trump text messages between the lovers.

Strzok’s testimony was made available Thursday by Rep. Doug Collins, R-Ga., the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee. Collins released Justice Department official Bruce Ohr’s testimony March 8 and on Tuesday he released Page’s testimony.

Strzok Escorted Out of FBI Headquarters June, 2018

In June, 2018 there were a handful of stories that revealed then-FBI Special Agent Strzok was escorted out of FBI headquarters by officials.

(Excerpt) Read more at saraacarter.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: doj; fbi; jamescomey; lisapage; mueller; peterstrzok; robertmueller; stzrok
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 03/15/2019 7:51:52 AM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

p


2 posted on 03/15/2019 7:52:05 AM PDT by bitt (The pain IS coming!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

It is FBI security policy that when someone with security clearance engages in an adulterous affair, he must make his superior aware of his actions to preclude the likelihood of a successful blackmail by opposition operatives. Doubt Lisa and Peter followed the rules and should have been fired when found out. Both are amoral lowlifes capable of anything.


3 posted on 03/15/2019 7:57:27 AM PDT by allendale (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

DOJ Deal With FBI on Clinton Foundation——In one of the most explosive parts of Strzok’s testimony, he revealed that the Department of Justice struck a deal with the FBI not to investigate the Clinton Foundation emails.

Then-majority general counsel Zachary Somers asked Strzok if the “the Clinton Foundation was on the server.” Strzok said he believed that it was “on one of the servers, if not the others.” However, he noted that there was an agreement between the DOJ and Hillary Clinton that the FBI was not allowed to search Clinton Foundation emails for that information.

Several sources have told SaraACarter.com that there is an ongoing FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation. One of the FBI field offices believed to be part of the ongoing investigation is in Little Rock, Arkansas, the former home of President Bill Clinton and his wife.

“Were you given access to those emails as part of the investigation,” Somer’s asks Strzok. “We were not. We did not have access,” Strzok said. He said the FBI eventually was granted access to the Clinton’s server, but only after negotiating with Clinton’s attorneys.

The FBI “had it voluntarily in the context — in the case of the servers, voluntarily in the context of consent that was worked out between DOJ attorneys and counsel for Secretary Clinton.” He said the attorney’s kept them from searching on the foundation and there was “a significant filter team that was put in place to work through the various terms of the various consent agreements.”


4 posted on 03/15/2019 7:57:31 AM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

And nothing will come of any of it.


5 posted on 03/15/2019 7:57:42 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

“And nothing will come of any of it.”

Fact.

Most Republicans are part of the deep state. The few that would do anything are powerless due to the numbers.

In a rational world, both D’s and R’s would be violently outraged over this. Appointed officials doing as they please, and trying to reverse an election!

And the public continues it’s slumber.


6 posted on 03/15/2019 8:03:01 AM PDT by brownsfan (Behold, the power of government cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Liz

DOJ Deal With FBI on Clinton Foundation——In one of the most explosive parts of Strzok’s testimony, he revealed that the Department of Justice struck a deal with the FBI not to investigate the Clinton Foundation emails.

**************

This will be the lead story on CNN all week long. NOT!


7 posted on 03/15/2019 8:05:24 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Liz

“Were you given access to those emails as part of the investigation,” Somer’s asks Strzok. “We were not. We did not have access,” Strzok said. He said the FBI eventually was granted access to the Clinton’s server, but only after negotiating with Clinton’s attorneys.

The FBI “had it voluntarily in the context — in the case of the servers, voluntarily in the context of consent that was worked out between DOJ attorneys and counsel for Secretary Clinton.” He said the attorney’s kept them from searching on the foundation and there was “a significant filter team that was put in place to work through the various terms of the various consent agreements.”

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

two sets of laws?

who was on the “filter team” cheryl mills & huma abedin?


8 posted on 03/15/2019 8:19:47 AM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Strzok was defiant during the questioning regarding Page, saying he would absolutely not give in to blackmail by anyone who would attempt to do so. He said he had not been blackmailed or coerced by anyone but if he had he “would immediately go report that to my superiors and see how they wanted to follow up…

An example of 100% pure anti-Trump bullsh*t!

9 posted on 03/15/2019 8:20:01 AM PDT by immadashell (Save Innocent Lives - ban gun free zones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thinden
......two sets of laws?....who was on the “filter team” cheryl mills & huma abedin?

BOL.......no doubt.

10 posted on 03/15/2019 8:23:31 AM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: thinden
AND THIS.... (AFTER SHE LOST OBAMA "SUDDENLY" REMEMBERED)
Obama Had a Deal With Hillary Allowing Removal Of State Dept Records.

By RYAN SAAVEDRA, dailywire.com, Dec 15, 2017

Newly-revealed documents obtained by conservative watchdog Judicial Watch reveal that the Obama State Department allowed Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her top aide Huma Abedin to remove sensitive documents that were not to be made public records (including official “Muslim Engagement Documents”).

Judicial Watch received the records on Thursday in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request that sought all DS-1904 forms completed by or on behalf of Former Secretary Hillary Clinton, Former Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, Former Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin, and Former Deputy Chief of Staff Jacob Sullivan.

Clinton and Abedin were permitted to remove both electronic and physical records, claiming “they were ‘personal’ materials and ‘unclassified, non-record materials,’ including files of Clinton’s calls and schedules, which were not to be made public.”

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton noted the gravity of the latest revelations, stating they showed further corruption in the Obama administration and with Clinton.

“We already know the Obama State Department let Hillary Clinton steal and then delete her government emails, which included classified information,” Fitton said in a statement. “But these new records show that was only part of the scandal. These new documents show the Obama State Department had a deal with Hillary Clinton to hide her calls logs and schedules, which would be contrary to FOIA and other laws.”

Electronic records Clinton was allowed to remove:
Copy of “daily files.”
Non-record copy of a log of calls the Secretary made since 2004.
Official and personal copy of the Secretary’s “call grid” which is a running list of calls she wants to make.
Physical records Clinton was allowed to remove: 16 boxes of personal schedules from 1993-2008 (prior to her becoming Secretary of State).
29 boxes of miscellaneous public schedules ranging from her time as FLOTUS up to her State Dept tenure.
1 box of personal reimbursable receipts. 1 box of personal photos. 1 box personal schedule.
Personal correspondence.
Daily file binders. Gift binders. Gifts (actual). Topic binders.

Electronic records Abedin was allowed to remove
Outlook contacts.

Physical records Abedin was allowed to remove (5 boxes): Travel Records Muslim Engagement Documents Newspaper Articles
Gift Archive Binder
FLOTUS “Courtesy Storage/Box Content List” Binder
CODEL Trips Binder
Menu Cards & Table Arrangement Binder
Personal Event Planner (2001 thru 2011)

“The originals of some Clinton documents were retained, such as the call logs and schedules,” Judicial Watch reports. “For other records, including material that predates Clinton’s tenure, there is no indication that a copy was made. The most significant of these are Hillary's personal correspondence and gift binders, which could reflect Clinton Foundation and Clinton Global Initiative ties.”

SOURCE https://www.dailywire.com/news/24711/obama-state-dept-made-deal-hillary-allowing-ryan-saavedra#exit-modal

=======================================

NOTE WELL--Hillary listed the removed items itemized above.....making it totally unverifiable.

11 posted on 03/15/2019 8:25:46 AM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
In a rational world, both D’s and R’s would be violently outraged over this. Appointed officials doing as they please, and trying to reverse an election!

With the size of the opposition to Trump in the Deep State it is amazing he got elected. It leads me to believe that if this opposition did not exist, he would have won by a landslide.

12 posted on 03/15/2019 8:28:33 AM PDT by immadashell (Save Innocent Lives - ban gun free zones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Liz; bitt; little jeremiah; a little elbow grease

Electronic records Clinton was allowed to remove:
Copy of “daily files.”
Non-record copy of a log of calls the Secretary made since 2004.
Official and personal copy of the Secretary’s “call grid” which is a running list of calls she wants to make.
Physical records Clinton was allowed to remove: 16 boxes of personal schedules from 1993-2008 (prior to her becoming Secretary of State).
29 boxes of miscellaneous public schedules ranging from her time as FLOTUS up to her State Dept tenure.
1 box of personal reimbursable receipts. 1 box of personal photos. 1 box personal schedule.
Personal correspondence.
Daily file binders. Gift binders. Gifts (actual). Topic binders.

Electronic records Abedin was allowed to remove
Outlook contacts.

Physical records Abedin was allowed to remove (5 boxes): Travel Records Muslim Engagement Documents Newspaper Articles
Gift Archive Binder
FLOTUS “Courtesy Storage/Box Content List” Binder
CODEL Trips Binder
Menu Cards & Table Arrangement Binder
Personal Event Planner (2001 thru 2011)

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

suppose any of these boxes of “clintonista contraband” ended up at huma’s cousin’s house in michigan that was raided (and boxes hauled off, irrc???)


13 posted on 03/15/2019 8:35:44 AM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
... the public continues it’s slumber.

Largely because we no longer have an independent press. Of course, the press was angry at Nixon in 1972 for having been a staunch anti-communist and wanted to bring him down.

14 posted on 03/15/2019 8:40:07 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bitt

I believe that, as a holder of a security clearance, he was required to reveal his affair, as “adverse information” — having not done so should have led to having his clearance revoked, and his being fired.

Further, anybody who also had a clearance who knew of his affair was required by law to report the adverse information.


15 posted on 03/15/2019 8:42:11 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

:: Electronic records Abedin was allowed to remove
Outlook contacts. ::

Think of your Outlook contacts and then, go type in a single letter and let auto-fill do the work.
How many contacts come up?
How man are current?
How many are little used or...more than 5 years old?

What might have filled in when Huma typed on B? or, O?


16 posted on 03/15/2019 8:43:07 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Liz

“The FBI “had it voluntarily in the context — in the case of the servers, voluntarily in the context of consent that was worked out between DOJ attorneys and counsel for Secretary Clinton.” He said the attorney’s kept them from searching on the foundation and there was “a significant filter team that was put in place to work through the various terms of the various consent agreements.”

Hillary Clinton set up a completely illegal server with classified information on it and worse but the FBI negotiates with her lawyers on what information they can look at?

This is the definition of insanity. Why didn’t the FBI raid Hillary Clinton’s home and seize the server when it was discovered? They sent more armed people after Roger Stone over nothing than Osama bin Laden.


17 posted on 03/15/2019 8:43:25 AM PDT by romanesq (For George Soros so loved the world, he gave us Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: immadashell

Unfortunately for him, the law doesn’t say “report if you are blackmailed”, it says “report any adverse information that could be USED for blackmail”. He admits that the information COULD be used for blackmail, and admits he understands what he would have to do.


18 posted on 03/15/2019 8:44:28 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bitt

19 posted on 03/15/2019 8:45:02 AM PDT by dead (Our next president is going to be sooooo boring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

.....heh.....sure would like to see O......


20 posted on 03/15/2019 8:56:45 AM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson